SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 2, 2022

City of Oakland, California v. Issue : Whether a court may deny a plaintiff with an antitrust injury proximately caused by a defendant’s antitrust violation a Clayton Act cause of action based on a multifactor, prudential balancing test of “antitrust standing.”. Oakland Raiders. Disclosure : Goldstein & Russell, P.C.,

Government 98

Government Statute Cause of Action Entertainment 98

FDA Law Blog

DECEMBER 3, 2024

Rather, the bill is structured so that liability is fully determined by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) in an administrative proceeding without a jury, with “conclusive” factual findings made by that ALJ. If this is a cause of action for civil penalties, it is one that should be treated the same way as in Jarkesy. [In

Drafting 80

Drafting Court Cause of Action Attorney 80

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 4, 2025

The second lawsuit was filed more than two years later by California, Oregon, and Minnesota. Trump and California v. Trump asserted the following causes of action: Violation of the separation of powers doctrine. Trump or California v. The Plaintiffs Claims The plaintiffs in both Public Citizen, Inc.

Statute 59

Statute Litigating Litigation Court 59

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

Supreme Court denied fossil fuel companies’ petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision reversing the district court’s 2018 denial of Oakland’s and San Francisco’s motions to remand their climate change nuisance cases to California state court. California Coastal Commission , No. Chevron Corp.

Court 49

Court Litigating Litigation Statute 49