JURIST

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

Moreover, they highlighted that the court has consistently upheld that district courts lack jurisdiction over such issues, arguing that the court should find Axon lacks valid cause of action on the grounds that the “commencement of a commission adjudication is not immediately reviewable” This case will be considered in conjunction with (..)

Court 118

Court Cause of Action Statute Legal 118

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 28, 2024

But in the years since then, it became one of the most important rulings on federal administrative law, cited by federal courts more than 18,000 times. When the Supreme Court first issued its decision in the Chevron case more than 40 years ago, the decision was not necessarily regarded as a particularly consequential one.

Court 145

Court Statute Cause of Action Legal 145

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 8, 2024

The Court’s Chevron decision established a bedrock principle of administrative law. The two most closely watched involve whether the Court should overrule its landmark decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council , 467 U.S. 837 (1984). Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. Moab Partners, L.P. :

Statute 52

Statute Cause of Action Entertainment Court 52

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 2, 2022

Issue : Whether a court may deny a plaintiff with an antitrust injury proximately caused by a defendant’s antitrust violation a Clayton Act cause of action based on a multifactor, prudential balancing test of “antitrust standing.”. City of Oakland, California v. Oakland Raiders. Disclosure : Goldstein & Russell, P.C.,

Government 89

Government Statute Cause of Action Litigation 89

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 27, 2023

The government’s view in this case is that the Constitution affords Congress a broad authority to create new obligations by statute, and that because those statutory obligations were unknown to the common law, they are public rights that Congress can assign to an administrative tribunal without a jury.

Cause of Action 144

Cause of Action Court Administrative Law Statute 144

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 2, 2024

Barrett explained that the statute of limitations “begins to run only when the plaintiff has a complete and present cause of action.” To bring a challenge under the APA, she continued, a plaintiff must show that it was injured by the agency’s actions.

Court 134

Court Statute Cause of Action Administrative Law 134

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

A state administrative law judge found one late-2016 transfer to have violated FNHRA and ordered Talevski returned to VCR; the family chose to move him to a different facility. Talevski’s wife and legal guardian brought a Section 1983 action on his behalf against VCR, HHC, and other entities, alleging violations of his FNHRA rights.

Stare Decisis 88

Stare Decisis Statute Court Contract 88