Remove Administrative Law Remove Cause of Action Remove District of Columbia Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Can Plaintiffs Challenge President Trump’s “10-to-1” Deregulation Order? A Look Back at Lawsuits Challenging the Order’s Predecessor

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

District Court in the District of Columbia ultimately concluded that the plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge the EO. Trump asserted the following causes of action: Violation of the separation of powers doctrine. Ultra vires action. In both cases, the U.S. Trump and California v.

Statute 59
article thumbnail

Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal agencies

SCOTUSBlog

Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it was reasonable. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.)

Court 145
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court to hear major case on power of federal agencies

SCOTUSBlog

Justice John Paul Stevens set out a two-part test for courts to review an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers. If it has not, the court must uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it is reasonable. In the Supreme Court, the fisheries are represented by former U.S.

article thumbnail

July 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Court held that the provision used “extension” in its “temporal sense,” but that the statute did not impose a “continuity requirement” and instead allowed small refineries to apply for hardship extensions “at any time.” Living Rivers v. Hoffman , No. 4:19-cv-00057 (D. Utah June 21, 2021). In re Enbridge Energy, LP , Nos.

Court 49