SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 27, 2023

The government’s view in this case is that the Constitution affords Congress a broad authority to create new obligations by statute, and that because those statutory obligations were unknown to the common law, they are public rights that Congress can assign to an administrative tribunal without a jury.

Cause of Action 143

Cause of Action Court Administrative Law Statute 143

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 2, 2022

Share This week we highlight cert petitions (and one original action ) that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether New Jersey can withdraw from its Waterfront Commission Compact with New York concerning governance and law enforcement over the Port of New York and New Jersey. In New York v.

Government 93

Government Statute Cause of Action Entertainment 93

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 28, 2024

But in the years since then, it became one of the most important rulings on federal administrative law, cited by federal courts more than 18,000 times. Going forward, judges will be charged with interpreting the law faithfully, impartially, and independently, without deference to the government.

Court 145

Court Statute Cause of Action Legal 145

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

VCR is a government nursing facility in Indiana owned by petitioner Health and Hospital Corp., A state administrative law judge found one late-2016 transfer to have violated FNHRA and ordered Talevski returned to VCR; the family chose to move him to a different facility. a municipal entity.

Stare Decisis 94

Stare Decisis Statute Court Contract 94

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 8, 2024

The Court’s Chevron decision established a bedrock principle of administrative law. Texas : The Fifth Amendment government taking case involves when property owners can sue for compensation. The two most closely watched involve whether the Court should overrule its landmark decision in Chevron v. 837 (1984).

Statute 52

Statute Cause of Action Entertainment Court 52

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 2, 2024

joined a lawsuit challenging a 2011 regulation issued by the Federal Reserve Board governing the fees that merchants must pay whenever their customers use a debit card. Barrett explained that the statute of limitations “begins to run only when the plaintiff has a complete and present cause of action.”

Court 126

Court Statute Cause of Action Administrative Law 126

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

In an article published in 2014, law professor Thomas Merrill suggested that the Chevron decision was not regarded as a particularly consequential one when it was issued. But in the decades since then, it became one of the most significant rulings on federal administrative law, cited by federal courts more than 18,000 times.

Stare Decisis 141

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 141