SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 28, 2024

Kagan predicted that Friday’s ruling “will cause a massive shock to the legal system.” But in the years since then, it became one of the most important rulings on federal administrative law, cited by federal courts more than 18,000 times. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.

Court 145

Court Statute Cause of Action Legal 145

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

VCR is a government nursing facility in Indiana owned by petitioner Health and Hospital Corp., A state administrative law judge found one late-2016 transfer to have violated FNHRA and ordered Talevski returned to VCR; the family chose to move him to a different facility. a municipal entity.

Stare Decisis 88

Stare Decisis Statute Court Contract 88

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 2, 2024

joined a lawsuit challenging a 2011 regulation issued by the Federal Reserve Board governing the fees that merchants must pay whenever their customers use a debit card. Barrett explained that the statute of limitations “begins to run only when the plaintiff has a complete and present cause of action.”

Court 134

Court Statute Cause of Action Administrative Law 134

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

The stakes in the case are high: The challengers argue that the current deferential standard is unconstitutional, while the Biden administration contends that overturning the existing doctrine would be a “convulsive shock to the legal system.” The doctrine at the center of the case is known as the Chevron doctrine.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

The third-party complaint asserted that while the plaintiffs’ claims were meritless, Statoil, “as well as potentially the many other sovereign governments that use and promote fossil fuels,” must be joined as third-party defendants. Chevron filed similar notices of withdrawal in other cases brought by California localities. Living Rivers v.

Court 44

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 44