SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 28, 2024

Kagan predicted that Friday’s ruling “will cause a massive shock to the legal system.” But in the years since then, it became one of the most important rulings on federal administrative law, cited by federal courts more than 18,000 times. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.

Court 145

Court Statute Cause of Action Legal 145

JURIST

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

Malcolm Stewart, for the respondents, rebutted that as a longstanding principle, courts do not intervene in ongoing agency proceedings until it results in a rule or order “that imposes sanctions or determines legal rights or obligations.”

Court 118

Court Cause of Action Statute Legal 118

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

A state administrative law judge found one late-2016 transfer to have violated FNHRA and ordered Talevski returned to VCR; the family chose to move him to a different facility. Talevski’s wife and legal guardian brought a Section 1983 action on his behalf against VCR, HHC, and other entities, alleging violations of his FNHRA rights.

Stare Decisis 88

Stare Decisis Statute Court Contract 88

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 2, 2024

It reasoned that the six-year statute of limitations imposed by the Administrative Procedure Act, the federal law governing agency actions and the legal challenges to them, applied, even though Corner Post had not opened its doors until 2018.

Court 134

Court Statute Cause of Action Administrative Law 134

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

The stakes in the case are high: The challengers argue that the current deferential standard is unconstitutional, while the Biden administration contends that overturning the existing doctrine would be a “convulsive shock to the legal system.” The doctrine at the center of the case is known as the Chevron doctrine.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

The District of Utah held that the lease suspensions merely maintained the status quo and therefore were not major federal actions subject to NEPA; the conservation groups therefore lacked standing. The court found that the Commission adequately explained its rationale for rejecting the dollar figure adopted by the administrative law judge.

Court 44

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 44