ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 4, 2025

Facial challenges to the new EO are likely to present similar claims and to confront the same legal hurdles that ultimately blocked lawsuits challenging EO 13771. climate litigation database documents two facial challenges to the first Trump administrations EO 13771. Ultra vires action. The Sabin Centers U.S.

Statute 59

Statute Litigation Litigating Court 59

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 28, 2024

Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it was reasonable. Kagan predicted that Friday’s ruling “will cause a massive shock to the legal system.”

Court 145

Court Statute Cause of Action Legal 145

JURIST

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

In Monday’s oral argument, Paul Clement, on behalf of Axon, stated that the company is “challenging the constitutionality of statutes that insulate agency officials” and violate due process rights by “denying access to courts.”

Court 118

Court Cause of Action Statute Legal 118

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

1983 — which allows private suits for state and local deprivations of rights secured by federal law—to enforce federal statutes enacted under Congress’ spending clause power. Talevski’s wife and legal guardian brought a Section 1983 action on his behalf against VCR, HHC, and other entities, alleging violations of his FNHRA rights.

Stare Decisis 98

Stare Decisis Statute Court Contract 98

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 2, 2024

It reasoned that the six-year statute of limitations imposed by the Administrative Procedure Act, the federal law governing agency actions and the legal challenges to them, applied, even though Corner Post had not opened its doors until 2018. A federal district court dismissed the case.

Court 139

Court Statute Cause of Action Administrative Law 139

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

The stakes in the case are high: The challengers argue that the current deferential standard is unconstitutional, while the Biden administration contends that overturning the existing doctrine would be a “convulsive shock to the legal system.” The doctrine at the center of the case is known as the Chevron doctrine.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

The Court held that the provision used “extension” in its “temporal sense,” but that the statute did not impose a “continuity requirement” and instead allowed small refineries to apply for hardship extensions “at any time.” Living Rivers v. Hoffman , No. 4:19-cv-00057 (D. Utah June 21, 2021). In re Enbridge Energy, LP , Nos.

Court 49

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 49