Administrative Law, Cause of Action and Oregon

Can Plaintiffs Challenge President Trump’s “10-to-1” Deregulation Order? A Look Back at Lawsuits Challenging the Order’s Predecessor

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 4, 2025

The second lawsuit was filed more than two years later by California, Oregon, and Minnesota. Trump asserted the following causes of action: Violation of the separation of powers doctrine. In both cases, the U.S. The Plaintiffs Claims The plaintiffs in both Public Citizen, Inc. Trump and California v.

Statute

Statute Litigation Litigating Court

July 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

The District of Utah held that the lease suspensions merely maintained the status quo and therefore were not major federal actions subject to NEPA; the conservation groups therefore lacked standing. The court found that the Commission adequately explained its rationale for rejecting the dollar figure adopted by the administrative law judge.

Court

Court Statute Litigation Litigating

Paralegal Brief

Can Plaintiffs Challenge President Trump’s “10-to-1” Deregulation Order? A Look Back at Lawsuits Challenging the Order’s Predecessor

July 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

Webinars

Stay Connected