Patently O

JULY 24, 2024

Although these decisions may not have as significant an impact in patent law as in other areas, they do pose interesting puzzles with respect to stare decisis as well as agency rulemaking and discretion that will provide many litigation opportunities going forward. no standing requirement). In the 2018 case of SAS v.

Stare Decisis 53

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Construction Laws 53

Patently O

JULY 2, 2024

In the past, both the USPTO and patent attorneys have largely ignored the larger scope of administrative law, but in recent years USPTO operations have been under tighter control from the White House, and courts have increasingly asked whether the agency is following the rules. to dictate the outcome of cases.”

Stare Decisis 49

Stare Decisis Statute Construction Administrative Law 49

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 20, 2022

Cochran , the justices will decide whether federal district courts have the power to consider claims challenging the constitutionality of the commission’s administrative law proceedings. In Securities and Exchange Commission v. The case is sufficiently similar to Axon Enterprise, Inc. Breckon , pending the outcome in Jones.

Stare Decisis 126

Stare Decisis Court Lawyer Lawyers 126

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 11, 2022

Both cases arise in the context of administrative proceedings brought by independent enforcement agencies against regulated parties — Axon by the Federal Trade Commission, and Cochran by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Federal prisoners raise that issue in pending petitions in Ham v. Breckon and Jones v. Returning Relists.

Stare Decisis 84

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Statute Government 84