This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court on Monday heard oral arguments in a case where the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) refused to approve flavored e-cigarettes, citing public health concerns. The justices were skeptical of the vape companies’ argument and the lower court’s decision. The result remains to be seen.
“Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer’s legacy in administrativelaw”: This audio segment featuring law professor Adrian Vermeule appeared on this evening’s broadcast of NPR’s “All Things Considered.”
The US Supreme Court Monday granted both Jones v. The Supreme Court previously denied Jones certiorari but granted it after the Eighth Circuit affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of his habeas petition in August 2021. The court is anticipated to hear arguments in these two cases in the fall. ” Jones v.
The US Supreme Court Monday heard oral arguments in Securities and Exchange Commission v. The court will decide whether the federal district courts have the ability to hear challenges against US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proceedings, or whether those challenges must remain within the SEC’s administrativecourts.
The US Supreme Court Thursday held that Social Security disability claimants are not bound by the issue-exhaustion requirement in administrativelaw judge (ALJ) hearings. Writing for a 9-0 court, Justice Sonia Sotomayor concluded that although the Social Security claimants in Carr v.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau named the Honorable Mahmud Jamal to the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) on Thursday. Jamal will replace the retiring Justice Rosalie Abella, and becomes the first person of color to sit on Canada’s highest court. The selection process follows the guidelines of the Supreme Court Act of 1985.
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Thursday instructed the District Court for the Northern District of Georgia to dismiss Marjorie Taylor Greene’s lawsuit over a challenge to her congressional candidacy. Greene asked the district court to bar the challenge.
The AdministrativeCourt of Paris on Wednesday held that the French state is “responsible” for failing to take sufficient measures to halt climate change and for failing to meet its greenhouse gas emission targets.
If I had to pick a case as the potential “sleeper” of the term—a case which is not getting a great deal of attention but that could have a huge impact—I’d select Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, scheduled for argument Nov.
The US Supreme Court ruled on Friday that courts must exercise independent judgment in assessing an agency’s statutory authority. The Supreme Court did not decide on the facts of Loper. The Loper court disagreed, finding that “ Chevron was a judicial invention that required judges to disregard their statutory duties.”
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. The last scheduled conference of the Supreme Court’s term — which this term is being held Thursday — is usually one that yields many grants. citizen for a benefit under state law.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Wednesday held that the Security and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) in-house adjudication violated the petitioner hedge fund manager’s Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. Jarkesy and Patriot28 then appealed the decision to federal court.
The US Supreme Court Wednesday heard oral arguments in Perez v. An administrative judge dismissed Perez’s ADA claim on the grounds that the judge lacked jurisdiction to hear it. The suit was dismissed due to Mr. Perez’s failure to utilize all administrative remedies before filing suit. Sturgis Public Schools.
Supreme Court's dismantling of a 40-year-old judicial deference doctrine, coupled with rulings stripping federal agencies of certain enforcement powers and exposing them to additional litigation, has established the October 2023 term as likely the most consequential in administrativelaw history.
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit accepted all three arguments and invalidated three aspects of the SEC’s operations. Within that framework, the public rights doctrine is the doctrine that allows administrative agencies, operating without a jury, to impose monetary penalties.
The US Supreme Court on Monday heard oral arguments Monday in United States v. a case that intersects patent law, administrativelaw and the separation of powers. The justices seemed skeptical of the argument that the administrative patent judges were not principal officers. Arthrex, Inc.,
DCWP filed a complaint in the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings, the city’s central, independent administrativelawcourt. The DCWP , formed by the NYC Consumer Protection Law of 1969, seeks to “protect and enhance the daily economic lives of New Yorkers.”
After hours of oral argument in a closely watched administrativelaw case, it appeared that some U.S. Supreme Court justices could be open to limiting the opportunities for lower courts to defer to federal agencies' legal interpretations in disputes over rulemaking — and legal experts said there are a number of ways they could do it.
Share In a major ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday cut back sharply on the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.)
The JAA would extend the same basic workplace protections that apply to most other workers, to judiciary employees who support the daily functioning of our courts; and it would ensure that judges who interpret federal anti-discrimination laws, are themselves subject to them. Many thought LAPs Clerkships Database couldnt be done.
The US Supreme Court heard arguments in the consolidated cases Wilkinson v. Administrativelaw generally was also featured during the arguments. Justice Neil Gorsuch questioned the expanse of federal court review. Dai and Wilkinson v. Alcaraz-Enriquez on Tuesday. ” Wilkinson v.
The Danish Court of Impeachment, or Rigsretten, Monday sentenced former Danish immigration minister Inger Støjberg to 60 days in prison. As immigration minister, Støjberg was responsible for administrating and enforcing Danish immigration law during the 2015 European migration crisis.
The Indian Supreme Court on Monday issued notice in a petition challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which require an advocate to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) within two years after enrolment to a State Bar Council. Bar Council of India and Indian Council of Legal Aid & Advice v. Bar Council of India.
Share Union organizing efforts at Starbucks probably are the most protracted labor dispute of the decade, and on Tuesday the Supreme Court will hear argument in a closely watched case arising from the company’s firing of seven employees at a Memphis branch. The NLRB responded by filing an administrative complaint.
Unlike district courts, the ITC cannot award monetary damages but instead provides exclusion orders that block infringing imports at the border and cease-and-desist orders that prevent domestic sales of previously imported infringing products.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s brief opinion for the court treated the case as a simple one. First, she addressed the government’s argument that the relevant law is an administrativelaw not subject to the Constitution’s bankruptcy clause. Accordingly, the opinion finds the framework permitting the disparity impermissible.
A Brazilian Supreme Court ( Supremo Tribunal Federal ) justice, on Thursday, issued an order revoking the passport of former Environment Minister Ricardo Salles. The post Brazil Supreme Court revokes passport of ex-Environmental Minister amid illegal timber sale investigations appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
The US National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled Monday that Starbucks violated federal labor laws by firing two workers who were planning to organize a union at a Philadelphia store in 2020. Starbucks has the ability to appeal the decision to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency has shed light on how the court's decision could significantly limit the federal government's efforts to address climate change, and reshape administrativelaw and the separation of powers, say Matthew Sinkman and Andrew Alessandro at Gibbons.
Supreme Court's landmark doctrine requiring judicial deference to federal regulators survived a major health care case at the high court Wednesday, but the controversial bedrock of administrativelaw barely escaped the conservative justices' frying pan and is heading right back into their fire, experts say.
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against the federal government and in favor of people seeking Social Security benefits on a procedural issue about administrative “exhaustion” requirements. The court ruled 9-0 that claimants need not raise all of their specific issues before the agency.
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the consolidated cases of Davis v. The circuit courts in both Davis (Eighth Circuit) and Carr (Tenth Circuit) chose to maintain the general rule that an issue must be raised by the claimant before the agency in order to seek judicial review on that issue. Saul and Carr v.
Latty Distinguished Professor of Law and Co-Director, Center for Innovation Policy at Duke Law In a flurry of recent decisions, the Supreme Court has continued its skepticism of administrative agencies. Consider first stare decisis and the Court’s overruling of Chevron deference (i.e. Guest post by Arti K.
In the 2018 case, the plaintiffs were found not to have standing because their interest in not suffering damage from climate change was not considered an individual interest to be protected (see Japanese Courts Admit the Operation of New Coal-Fired Power Plants in Kobe for more discussion). Kobe Steel Ltd.,
By knocking down a powerful precedent that has towered over administrativelaw for 40 years, the U.S. Supreme Court's right wing Friday gave a crowning achievement to anti-agency attorneys.
The US Supreme Court Monday heard oral arguments in Axon Enterprise, Inc. Axon filed proceedings in federal district court claiming that agency proceedings violate its due process rights. ” Stewart argued that the FTC Act review provisions authorizes courts of appeals to review final commission orders.
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday firmly rejected the government’s request that the court impose an “issue-exhaustion” requirement on Social Security claimants. Saul ), all parties agreed that those claimants must take their claims first to the Social Security Administration – and these claimants did that.
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with the federal government in a dispute over when federal courts can treat asylum seekers’ testimony as credible. Alcaraz-Enriquez , the court rejected the approach of the U.S. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion for the court. Dai and Garland v.
The AdministrativeCourt in Cologne Tuesday ruled that key provisions of the amended Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG), aimed at curbing online hate speech, violate European Union law on civil liberties. The ruling delivered a partial victory to Google and Meta that had challenged the new law in February last year.
The US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 on Monday in United States v. Arthrex that the America Invents Act gives powers to Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) that are inconsistent with the appointments clause of the US Constitution. ” Justice Clarence Thomas was the sole member of the court to dissent on both issues.
Chevron isn't gone yet, but it doesn't look good for the case that's the foundation of administrativelaw. The post Remembering <em>Chevron</em> Deference appeared first on Above the Law.
Empire Health Foundation, the Supreme Court had yet another chance to topple the Chevron doctrine , a stalwart of administrativelaw under which courts generally defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous statutes. The court made no mention of the Chevron doctrine , appearing to leave it intact.
Paralegals cannot appear in court on behalf of a client. This is a pretty simple rule to adhere to; paralegals are not recognized in most courts. However, this is not always the case, as a limited number of administrativelawcourts may allow paralegal client representation in special cases.
An important development occurred yesterday evening in both the OSHA and CMS vaccine mandate cases pending before the Supreme Court. The Court took the very rare step of scheduling a special hearing for both sets of cases. Suffice to say, it is exceedingly rare for the Court to hear oral argument on stay applications.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content