This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
At the risk of sounding like a lawyer: it will depend. The NFT will have to pass the Howey test, first described by the US Supreme Court in 1946. Most likely, it will take a couple of room-clearing courtdecisions to help owners and litigants navigate their waters. The post NFTs And The Law: What Do I Actually Own?
The second, and arguably more significant, policy prohibited its lawyers from civilly prosecuting companies for violating “requirements” set forth in agency guidance documents. As a matter of administrativelaw, the Brand Memo made good sense from the perspective of FDA-regulated industry, as we described here.
Cochran , the justices will decide whether federal district courts have the power to consider claims challenging the constitutionality of the commission’s administrativelaw proceedings. The case is sufficiently similar to Axon Enterprise, Inc. The justices also granted review in Jones v.
She challenges assumptions, pressing lawyers to grapple with broader systemic consequences and the lived experiences behind the law. She sought to understand the risks of prematurely deciding the venue issue without sufficient lower court development and highlighted the potential for broader repercussions beyond the specific case.
.” These protestations may be disingenuous coming from judges who relish issuing orders without written opinions, but entirely correct that the most damning takedowns of shoddy, politically motivated courtdecisions are those grounded in the text of an opinion. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments.
A state administrativelaw judge agreed that Greene’s “heated rhetoric may well have contributed to the environment that ultimately led to” the attack on the Capitol, but he concluded that she had not engaged in an insurrection. In 2022, Georgia officials rebuffed a challenge to U.S. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s eligibility. And on Dec.
Judicial Appointments A significant reshaping of the judiciary, particularly to the Supreme Court and federal appellate courts, has reshaped the judiciary. These appointments are already influencing rulings on key areas, including administrativelaw, corporate litigation, and constitutional law. They are smart.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content