Administrative Law Court Court Decisions 
JURIST
DECEMBER 2, 2024
The US Supreme Court on Monday heard oral arguments in a case where the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) refused to approve flavored e-cigarettes, citing public health concerns. The justices were skeptical of the vape companies’ argument and the lower court’s decision. The result remains to be seen.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 1, 2021
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with the federal government in a dispute over when federal courts can treat asylum seekers’ testimony as credible. Alcaraz-Enriquez , the court rejected the approach of the U.S. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion for the court. Dai and Garland v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Law 360
MARCH 4, 2022
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency has shed light on how the court's decision could significantly limit the federal government's efforts to address climate change, and reshape administrative law and the separation of powers, say Matthew Sinkman and Andrew Alessandro at Gibbons.
Law 360
JUNE 28, 2024
Supreme Court's decision reining in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's use of administrative courts is unlikely to help Walmart and SpaceX escape proceedings for alleged immigration-related violations, with the justices punting on the authority of administrative law judges.
FDA Law Blog
JANUARY 15, 2024
Koblitz — You know a court decision is going to be worth reading when the judges compare FDA’s regulatory governance of flavored e-cigarettes to a Shakespearean gaslighting. Petitioners moved to stay their Marketing Denial Orders pending review in Court. Though a Fifth Circuit merits panel refused, the Court granted rehearing.
LawTechnologyToday
JUNE 21, 2021
The NFT will have to pass the Howey test, first described by the US Supreme Court in 1946. That is, of course, the SEC’s view (and not the Courts), but it no doubt sends alarms to those who think the Commission will turn a blind eye. Julian Pipolo is an Australasian lawyer working at a top-tier firm predominantly in administrative law.
Constitutional Law Reporter
MAY 30, 2023
Supreme Court’s decision in Axon Enterprise, Inc. Federal Trade Commission , 598 U.S. _ (2023), allows federal district courts to consider constitutional challenges to administrative proceedings prior to the issuance of final rulings. Cochran’s and Axon’s suits were both dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
211 
Let's personalize your content