This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Supreme Court could be pinpointed to a single seat. With his retirement, and the appointments of Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, the Court adopted a solid 63 conservative majority. With his retirement, and the appointments of Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, the Court adopted a solid 63 conservative majority.
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit vacated the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) highly anticipated "click-to-cancel" rule on Tuesday after the court found that the commission had not followed proper procedures in setting the regulations. The FTC estimated that the "click-to-cancel" rule would have impacted 106,000 entities.
In a series of recent decisions, federal courts across the United States have addressed a range of significant legal issues, from civil rights and constitutional law to administrative authority and criminal justice. DEA , where the court upheld the DEAs denial of psilocybin use under the Controlled Substances Act.
This post is part of a new Climate Law Blog series, 100 Days of Trump 2.0 , in which the Sabin Center offers reflections on the first hundred days of President Trumps second term across a variety of climate-related topics. In addition to the blanket IRA funding freeze, the Trump administration has also targeted some individual IRA programs.
The AdministrativeCourt of Paris on Wednesday held that the French state is “responsible” for failing to take sufficient measures to halt climate change and for failing to meet its greenhouse gas emission targets.
The US Supreme Courtruled on Friday that courts must exercise independent judgment in assessing an agency’s statutory authority. The Supreme Court did not decide on the facts of Loper. This overruled the deference afforded to an agency’s interpretation of its mandate from Chevron U.S.A.
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against the federal government and in favor of people seeking Social Security benefits on a procedural issue about administrative “exhaustion” requirements. The courtruled 9-0 that claimants need not raise all of their specific issues before the agency.
The Supreme Court of Japan may soon weigh in on a growing field of climate litigation in Japan against coal-fired power plants. On May 6, 2022, the Citizens’ Committee on the Kobe Coal-Fired Power Plant filed an appeal to Japan’s Supreme Court in Citizens’ Committee on the Kobe Coal-Fired Power Plant v. Civil law cases.
The General Counsel found that the company was violating federal law by preventing staff from wearing BLM imagery on their aprons. That includes the Supreme Court’s unambiguous statement that “[w]hen an employee engages in speech that is part of the employee’s job duties, the employee’s words are really the words of the employer.”
Supreme Court case that could spell the end of administrativelawcourts, urging the nation's highest court to reverse a lower courtruling that the agency says could prevent it from protecting investors against potentially harmful conduct.
Ibrain Hernández is a law student at Center for Economic Research and Teaching, a public university in Mexico City. Who were your role models when you were studying law, and did any of them inspire you to become a justice? Supreme Court justice. Early in my career, I was interested in administrativelaw and antitrust.
Cochran present a frontal assault on the traditional framework under which federal courts have entertained complaints about federal agencies. The first case involves Axon Enterprise, an Arizona company that makes police body cameras and other technology products for law enforcement. SEC that the ALJ’s appointment was unlawful.
In a major ruling, the Supreme Court overturned their decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council that gave federal agencies great leeway in interpretation of laws. What is Chevron Deference In 1984, the Supreme Court decided Chevron v.
The US Supreme Courtruled Tuesday in Moore v. The theory stipulates that state legislatures retain exclusive authority over the administration of elections; therefore, state courts are not allowed to intervene, even if the law in question violates the state constitution.
The US Supreme Courtruled 5-4 on Monday in United States v. Arthrex that the America Invents Act gives powers to Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) that are inconsistent with the appointments clause of the US Constitution. ” Justice Clarence Thomas was the sole member of the court to dissent on both issues. .”
Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit that found the funding mechanism for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau unconstitutional. To enforce these laws, Congress created the SEC.
Summer School on the new Foreign Relations Law. The Summer School, which brought together 20 young scholars, was also the first step in a large-scale research project that Karen Knop will lead in the coming years as one of the first Max Planck Law Fellows. Foreign Relations Law as a law in between. Report on the.
A House Committee is alleging that the Administration failed to properly reappoint directors at the National Institutes of Health. For reasons the Biden administration has yet to explain, it appears to have ignored the law, according to the House committee. That, too, is not allowed under federal law. Rand Paul (R-Ky.),
Below is my column in the Hill on upcoming year for the Supreme Court. The Court’s docket is likely to put the institution at ground zero of a heated election year. Here is the column: The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg once observed that “it’s hard not to have a big year at the Supreme Court.”
The US Supreme Court Thursday ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not have the authority under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act to enforce proposed power plant emission limitations in West Virginia v. EPA , the court is in a unique position as it is examining a rule that has yet to be implemented.
Share The Supreme Court will again weigh the executive branch’s authority to set immigration policy as some red states claim that the Biden administration’s enforcement decisions are too lax. The justices will hear the case in late November without waiting for a federal appeals court to weigh in. In a filing by U.S.
When looking at the judges appointed by both presidents, it is clear that their circuit court appointees show distinct patterns in terms of gender, race, and geographic representation. Court of Appeals circuits, including the Ninth, Fifth, and Seventh Circuits. The average vote differential for Trumps circuit court judges was 23.2.
Share Lawyers for Colorado’s Republican Party came to the Supreme Court on Wednesday, asking the justices to overturn a ruling by that state’s highest court that would leave former President Donald Trump off Colorado’s primary ballot in 2024 because of his role in the Jan. But the court put its ruling on hold until Jan.
Supreme Courtruled against "universal injunctions" last week, President Donald Trump hailed the decision as a "GIANT WIN" for his administration. born children will qualify for that status only if at least one parent is a citizen or lawful permanent resident. When the U.S. That take was misleading in two important ways.
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. Although the question comes to the court in a case from Colorado, the impact of the court’sruling could be much more far-reaching. And on Dec.
Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, to fill the vacancy left by the retirement of Justice Stephen Breyer, he will take his mission to diversify professional representation to the next level, putting a former federal public defender on the highest court in the land. Sentencing Commission. Sentencing Commission.
immigration court. After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. solicitor general argues that the statutory basis for the Trump administration’s policy, 8 U.S.C.
Supreme Court declined to hold, in FTC v. 142 includes some new provisions (compared to previous iterations of the bill) to expressly provide for the Federal trade Commission (“FTC”) to obtain forfeiture and civil penalties in an administrative proceeding initiated by the Commission. Actavis, Inc., As we noted in our prior post, S.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content