JURIST

OCTOBER 6, 2022

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Wednesday ruled that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program was properly deemed illegal in a lower court decision last year. Because the court considers DACA a substantive rule, and because the program “did not undergo notice and comment,” it violates the APA.

Administrative Law 222

Administrative Law Court Laws Immigration 222

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 31, 2023

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit that found the funding mechanism for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau unconstitutional. To enforce these laws, Congress created the SEC.

Immigration 72

Immigration Administrative Law Government Court 72

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

Orthwein distinguished professor of law at Washington University in St. He is coauthor of a casebook on administrative law and has written many articles on that subject. There has never been any mystery about the jurisprudential premises of Justice Stephen Breyer’s approach to issues of public law. Similarly, in Lucia v.

Administrative Law 101

Administrative Law Laws Statute Government 101

JURIST

OCTOBER 3, 2022

He reminded his audience that “it was in our 2019 Manifesto that we laid out what we will update in the Human Rights Act and administrative law to ensure that there is a proper balance between the rights of individuals, our vital national security and effective government.”.

Laws 183

Laws Government Legal Services Immigration 183

JURIST

JUNE 12, 2022

A US federal judge Friday granted a request to dismiss a policy by President Joe Biden’s administration that narrows the detaining and deportation of immigrants. ” US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Judge Drew Tipton said in his opinion that enforcing the memo is “arbitrary and capricious.”

Immigration 104

Immigration Administrative Law Court Laws 104

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 21, 2022

During the week of June 13, the Supreme Court decided two immigration cases (involving bond hearings for noncitizens in immigration detention) and declined to decide a third (involving the Trump-era “public charge” policy for green card applicants). The post An important week for immigration law appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Immigration 87

Immigration Laws Administrative Law Court 87

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 2, 2020

This afternoon I have the pleasure of joining a distinguished panel to speak on the Supreme Court at the University of Southern California’s Gould School of Law. The event is part of the LACBA Business Law Section 2020 Virtual Institute for Corporate Counsel and will also include Michael J.

Law School 29

Law School Laws Court Immigration 29

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation. Texas and Louisiana went to federal court in Texas to challenge the policy.

Immigration 101

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 101

The Crime Report

OCTOBER 12, 2021

But a Stanford University researcher argues that basing deportation decisions of immigrants on the level of criminality without looking at the length of time they have been in the U.S. disrupts families and turns immigration services into a vehicle for crime control. longer, they are disrupting families with stronger ties to the U.S.,

Immigration 105

Immigration Laws Felony Attorney 105

JURIST

MARCH 8, 2025

of the US District Court for the District of Rhode Island stressed that the US Constitution gives Congress the sole authority to control federal spending. Throughout his opinion, Judge McConnell reiterated that federal agencies can only act within the scope authorized by law. In an extensive opinion, Chief Judge John J. McConnell Jr.

Government 197

Government Immigration Attorney Education 197

JURIST

FEBRUARY 21, 2022

The US Supreme Court agreed Friday to hear oral arguments in Biden v. The Biden administration seeks a declaration that it may cease enforcement of the “Remain in Mexico” immigration policy first implemented by former President Trump. The case before the Supreme Court hinges on two main issues.

Immigration 161

Immigration Court Government Administrative Law 161

JURIST

MARCH 10, 2021

The Attorneys General of Arizona and Montana filed an amended a joint lawsuit Monday alleging that the Biden administration has violated immigration and administrative law. The allegations arise from changes to policies governing the detention and deportation of undocumented immigrants.

Immigration 178

Immigration Attorney Administrative Law Laws 178

SCOTUSBlog

AUGUST 20, 2021

Share The Biden administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court for an immediate reprieve from having to reinstate a Trump-era program known as the “remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico immigration court. The court agreed in October 2020 to review a ruling by the U.S.

Immigration 100

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 100

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 7, 2022

immigration court. After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. The law, S.B. Remain in Mexico” policy. As the case proceeded to an appeal in the U.S.

Laws 121

Laws Immigration Court Legal 121

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to set immigration policy. Texas and Louisiana are challenging a federal policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation, arguing that it violates federal law.

Immigration 100

Immigration Government Healthcare Court 100

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 21, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will again weigh the executive branch’s authority to set immigration policy as some red states claim that the Biden administration’s enforcement decisions are too lax. The justices will hear the case in late November without waiting for a federal appeals court to weigh in. In a filing by U.S.

Immigration 142

Immigration Court Government Court Rules 142

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 7, 2022

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Last term, the court dismissed as improvidently granted, or “DIG”ed , a case brought by Republican-controlled states challenging the government’s repeal of a Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule.

Immigration 65

Immigration Litigation Litigating Administrative Law 65

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 15, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out an effort by Arizona and 12 other states with Republican attorneys general to defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. The case, Arizona v. The states went to the U.S.

Immigration 96

Immigration Government Administrative Law Court 96

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 19, 2023

In the year since the Supreme Court embraced the “major questions doctrine” (MQD), industry and Republican state attorneys general have argued that federal regulations ranging from stricter vehicle emissions standards to climate change disclosures must be struck down under its banner. Env’t Prot.

Statute 85

Statute Court Government Administrative Law 85

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 31, 2020

The Supreme Court on Thursday released the calendar for its February argument session, which begins on Feb. Innovation Law Lab , a challenge to the Trump administration’s “remain in Mexico” policy, which allows the Department of Homeland Security to return immigrants seeking asylum to Mexico while they wait for an asylum hearing in U.S.

Calendaring 124

Calendaring Immigration Misdemeanor Construction 124

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 20, 2021

Share A review of Ian Millhiser, The Agenda: How a Republican Supreme Court Is Reshaping America (Columbia Global Reports 2021). Millhiser begins the book by highlighting the Supreme Court’s present-day power and sketching the historical evolution that brought it to this point. Columbia Global Reports 2021).

Administrative Law 133

Administrative Law Court Immigration Laws 133

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. alleging that the repeal of the law violated federal administrative law.

Immigration 95

Immigration Court Administrative Law Government 95

The Estrin Report

MARCH 16, 2025

Legal teams are navigating shifting regulatory landscapes, interpreting new policies, and mitigating liability risks to ensure corporate adherence to new laws. Judicial Appointments A significant reshaping of the judiciary, particularly to the Supreme Court and federal appellate courts, has reshaped the judiciary.

Legal 161

Legal Legal Law Firm Law Firms 161