SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 29, 2023

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. The Supreme Court announced that it would hold its “mop up” conference for October Term 2022 on Thursday, after completing the day’s opinion announcements. A short explanation of relists is available here.

Immigration 77

Immigration Court Government Laws 77

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 31, 2023

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit that found the funding mechanism for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau unconstitutional. To enforce these laws, Congress created the SEC.

Immigration 95

Immigration Administrative Law Government Court 95

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

Orthwein distinguished professor of law at Washington University in St. He is coauthor of a casebook on administrative law and has written many articles on that subject. There has never been any mystery about the jurisprudential premises of Justice Stephen Breyer’s approach to issues of public law. Similarly, in Lucia v.

Administrative Law 106

Administrative Law Laws Statute Government 106

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 21, 2022

During the week of June 13, the Supreme Court decided two immigration cases (involving bond hearings for noncitizens in immigration detention) and declined to decide a third (involving the Trump-era “public charge” policy for green card applicants). The post An important week for immigration law appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Immigration 86

Immigration Laws Administrative Law Court 86

JURIST

JUNE 12, 2022

A US federal judge Friday granted a request to dismiss a policy by President Joe Biden’s administration that narrows the detaining and deportation of immigrants. ” US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Judge Drew Tipton said in his opinion that enforcing the memo is “arbitrary and capricious.”

Immigration 104

Immigration Administrative Law Court Laws 104

JURIST

OCTOBER 3, 2022

He reminded his audience that “it was in our 2019 Manifesto that we laid out what we will update in the Human Rights Act and administrative law to ensure that there is a proper balance between the rights of individuals, our vital national security and effective government.”.

Laws 183

Laws Government Legal Services Immigration 183

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 2, 2020

This afternoon I have the pleasure of joining a distinguished panel to speak on the Supreme Court at the University of Southern California’s Gould School of Law. The event is part of the LACBA Business Law Section 2020 Virtual Institute for Corporate Counsel and will also include Michael J.

Law School 32

Law School Laws Court Immigration 32

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation. Texas and Louisiana went to federal court in Texas to challenge the policy.

Immigration 107

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 107

The Crime Report

OCTOBER 12, 2021

But a Stanford University researcher argues that basing deportation decisions of immigrants on the level of criminality without looking at the length of time they have been in the U.S. disrupts families and turns immigration services into a vehicle for crime control. longer, they are disrupting families with stronger ties to the U.S.,

Immigration 105

Immigration Laws Felony Attorney 105

JURIST

FEBRUARY 21, 2022

The US Supreme Court agreed Friday to hear oral arguments in Biden v. The Biden administration seeks a declaration that it may cease enforcement of the “Remain in Mexico” immigration policy first implemented by former President Trump. The case before the Supreme Court hinges on two main issues.

Immigration 161

Immigration Court Government Administrative Law 161

JURIST

MARCH 10, 2021

The Attorneys General of Arizona and Montana filed an amended a joint lawsuit Monday alleging that the Biden administration has violated immigration and administrative law. The allegations arise from changes to policies governing the detention and deportation of undocumented immigrants.

Immigration 178

Immigration Attorney Administrative Law Laws 178

SCOTUSBlog

AUGUST 20, 2021

Share The Biden administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court for an immediate reprieve from having to reinstate a Trump-era program known as the “remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico immigration court. The court agreed in October 2020 to review a ruling by the U.S.

Immigration 104

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 104

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to set immigration policy. Texas and Louisiana are challenging a federal policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation, arguing that it violates federal law.

Immigration 104

Immigration Government Healthcare Court 104

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 21, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will again weigh the executive branch’s authority to set immigration policy as some red states claim that the Biden administration’s enforcement decisions are too lax. The justices will hear the case in late November without waiting for a federal appeals court to weigh in. In a filing by U.S.

Immigration 145

Immigration Court Government Court Rules 145

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 7, 2022

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Last term, the court dismissed as improvidently granted, or “DIG”ed , a case brought by Republican-controlled states challenging the government’s repeal of a Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule.

Immigration 83

Immigration Litigation Litigating Administrative Law 83

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 7, 2022

immigration court. After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. The law, S.B. Remain in Mexico” policy. As the case proceeded to an appeal in the U.S.

Laws 124

Laws Immigration Court Legal 124

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 15, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out an effort by Arizona and 12 other states with Republican attorneys general to defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. The case, Arizona v. The states went to the U.S.

Immigration 93

Immigration Government Administrative Law Court 93

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 31, 2020

The Supreme Court on Thursday released the calendar for its February argument session, which begins on Feb. Innovation Law Lab , a challenge to the Trump administration’s “remain in Mexico” policy, which allows the Department of Homeland Security to return immigrants seeking asylum to Mexico while they wait for an asylum hearing in U.S.

Calendaring 138

Calendaring Immigration Misdemeanor Construction 138

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 19, 2023

In the year since the Supreme Court embraced the “major questions doctrine” (MQD), industry and Republican state attorneys general have argued that federal regulations ranging from stricter vehicle emissions standards to climate change disclosures must be struck down under its banner. Env’t Prot.

Statute 83

Statute Court Government Administrative Law 83

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 20, 2021

Share A review of Ian Millhiser, The Agenda: How a Republican Supreme Court Is Reshaping America (Columbia Global Reports 2021). Millhiser begins the book by highlighting the Supreme Court’s present-day power and sketching the historical evolution that brought it to this point. Columbia Global Reports 2021).

Administrative Law 141

Administrative Law Court Immigration Laws 141

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. alleging that the repeal of the law violated federal administrative law.

Immigration 92

Immigration Court Administrative Law Government 92