This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday largely upheld the Food and Drug Administrations denials of two companies applications to sell flavored liquids for use in e-cigarettes. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit set aside the FDAs denial of the two companies applications. The full U.S.
Koblitz — You know a court decision is going to be worth reading when the judges compare FDA’s regulatory governance of flavored e-cigarettes to a Shakespearean gaslighting. FDA extended PMTA compliance deadlines for years so it could figure out appropriate application instructions and so that manufacturers could figure out how to comply.
The courts have issued several new and significant rulings on environmental and administrativelaw the past few weeks. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association, Inc. by Anthony B. See 81 FR 73478.)
Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duties : The ITC can impose anti-dumping duties on foreign manufacturers selling goods in the U.S. This change effectively removes the current presumption in favor of exclusionary relief — making ITC action more akin to the eBay analysis in district court. at less than fair value.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court, in which Nike claims that adidas also came up short. Unlike district court litigation, which can take several years to reach a trial date, a case filed before the ITC can proceed to an evidentiary hearing before an administrativelaw judge in eight to nine months.”.
5] A vertical merger is defined as “a merger between businesses occupying different levels of operation for the same product, such as between a manufacturer and a retailer.” [6] In September 2022, AdministrativeLaw Judge Chappell dismissed the FTC’s charges against Illumina. [11] 6] Merger , Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed.
DOC is rescinding the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain non-refillable steel cylinders (non-refillable cylinders) from the People’s Republic China (China), covering the period August 28, 2020, though December 31, 2021. . DOC announced on October 9, 2019, in the U.S. Limited (‘‘Top Golf’’) in default.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. The last scheduled conference of the Supreme Court’s term — which this term is being held Thursday — is usually one that yields many grants. citizen for a benefit under state law.
This is a brief account of some of the important environmental and administrativelaw cases recently decided. SUPREME COURT . On June 28, 2021, the Supreme Court decided the case of Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco. City and County of San Francisco. Comments are due by August 27, 2021.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. At this Friday’s conference, the Supreme Court will thus begin the process of considering what cases to review next fall during October Term 2022. The district court and U.S. What’s the difference ?
Supreme Court declined to hold, in FTC v. Such penalty shall accrue to the United States and may be recovered in a civil action brought by the Commission, in its own name by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose, in a district court of the United States against any party that violates this section. Actavis, Inc. ,
manufacturers and supplied them to Russian end-users. USITC has determined not to review two initial determinations (‘‘IDs’’) of the presiding administrativelaw judge (‘‘ALJ’’): (1) Order No. The investigation is terminated. . 23 terminating the investigation as to claims 17–21 of U.S. The White House and Congress.
DOC , through the Office of Trade and Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’) of the International Trade Administration, has received an application for an amended Export Trade Certificate of Review (‘‘Certificate’’). . DOC announced on January 6, 2020, in the U.S. 731–TA–860 (Final). . Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS).
Here is a recap of the latest customs and international trade law news: FDA. On May 9, 2022, the FDA issued a Constituent Update stating that Glanbia Performance Nutrition (Manufacturing), Inc. Glanbia), along with 10 other companies, was illegally selling adulterated dietary supplements. On May 1, 2022, the U.S.
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Tuesday in a clash over whether a North Carolina-based company can challenge the Food and Drug Administrations denial of its application to market e-cigarettes in the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Louisiana. The company, R.J.
Supreme Court held that the 5th Circuit erred in setting aside as arbitrary and capricious the FDAs orders denying the authorization of new e-cigarette products pursuant to the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009. Wages and White Lion Investments , LLC , 604 U.S. _ (2025), the U.S.
Supreme Court declined to hold, in FTC v. As weve discussed previously , the Preserve Access to Affordable Generics and Biosimilars Act , which addresses drug and biological product patent settlement agreements, has been floating around Congress in some form for about 20 years since well before the U.S. Actavis, Inc., 5) CIVIL PENALTY. (A)
Supreme Court declined to hold, in FTC v. As weve discussed previously , the Preserve Access to Affordable Generics and Biosimilars Act , which addresses drug and biological product patent settlement agreements, has been floating around Congress in some form for about 20 years since well before the U.S. Actavis, Inc., 5) CIVIL PENALTY. (A)
In the year since the Supreme Court embraced the “major questions doctrine” (MQD), industry and Republican state attorneys general have argued that federal regulations ranging from stricter vehicle emissions standards to climate change disclosures must be struck down under its banner. Env’t Prot.
Court of International Trade (CIT) A honey manufacturer filed a complaint at the CIT alleging that CBP unlawfully detained 11 shipments of honey for nearly a year without explanation or justification. The agency will open a submissions window In May, September, and January every year. The USITC determined that a U.S.
CBP seized a shipment of counterfeit designer jewelry with a Manufacturers Suggested Retail Price of $9,222,800, had the goods been genuine. Court of International Trade (CIT) The CIT denied a motion from importers to put an emergency block on President Trumps reciprocal tariffs. CIT ruled that Hoshine Silicon (Jia Xiang) Industry Co.
Following the 2007 landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. These emissions standards were significantly loosened in the last year of the Trump Administration. In 2021 the Biden Administration reversed the Trump-era rollbacks and instituted the strictest-ever vehicle GHG emissions standards in a move aimed at preventing 3.1
(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) Supreme Court oral arguments are more than just legal debatestheyre a high-stakes battleground where justices reveal their philosophies, test the strength of arguments, and sometimes, subtly try to persuade their colleagues. One clear distinction is in their total engagement at oral argument.
When the SEC initially proposed the rule, the Supreme Court had not yet embraced the Major Questions Doctrine (MQD), a new doctrine that constrains the function of the administrative state. In the Supreme Court’s recent decision Biden v. While the decision has been appealed , a federal district court in Utah v.
(Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images) Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, once celebrated as a stalwart conservative and a crowning achievement of the Trump presidency, now finds herself under fire from the very base that championed her confirmation. Her recent vote in Department of State v. Lets unpack the data.
Court of International Trade (CIT) The U.S. A FMC administrativelaw judge ordered Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) to pay $16 million in civil penalties for violating U.S. shipping laws. brought a complaint against importer Shunny Corp., which would provide more tools for the U.S.
Legal teams are navigating shifting regulatory landscapes, interpreting new policies, and mitigating liability risks to ensure corporate adherence to new laws. Judicial Appointments A significant reshaping of the judiciary, particularly to the Supreme Court and federal appellate courts, has reshaped the judiciary.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content