SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 6, 2022

Since 1986, in all states other than Alabama or North Carolina, those cases have been administered by the U.S. In Alabama and North Carolina, by contrast, the cases have been administered by trustees appointed by the judicial branch. Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s brief opinion for the court treated the case as a simple one.

Court 103

Court Statute Administrative Law Laws 103

JURIST

JUNE 27, 2023

The US Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in Moore v. The theory stipulates that state legislatures retain exclusive authority over the administration of elections; therefore, state courts are not allowed to intervene, even if the law in question violates the state constitution.

Court 211

Court Administrative Law Court Decisions Court Rules 211

SCOTUSBlog

AUGUST 3, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will kick off its November argument session with the highest-profile cases of that session: challenges to the consideration of race in the admissions process at Harvard and the University of North Carolina. University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. 11, to Nov.

Calendaring 120

Calendaring Criminal Law Administrative Law Court 120

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 20, 2022

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. At this Friday’s conference, the Supreme Court will thus begin the process of considering what cases to review next fall during October Term 2022. The district court and U.S. What’s the difference ?

Statute 103

Statute Court Education Administrative Law 103

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 20, 2025

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Tuesday in a clash over whether a North Carolina-based company can challenge the Food and Drug Administrations denial of its application to market e-cigarettes in the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Louisiana. The company, R.J.

Manufacturing 97

Manufacturing Court Laws Administrative Law 97

JonathanTurley

MAY 23, 2022

In a highly controversial opinion, NLRB administrative law judge, Kenneth Chu , ruled against The Federalist. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit just overturned Chu and stated the obvious: it was a joke. Nevertheless, Judge Chu found a violation of labor laws. It was a stupid and offensive tweet.

Litigating 51

Litigating Litigation Lawyer Lawyers 51

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 19, 2023

In the year since the Supreme Court embraced the “major questions doctrine” (MQD), industry and Republican state attorneys general have argued that federal regulations ranging from stricter vehicle emissions standards to climate change disclosures must be struck down under its banner. Env’t Prot.

Statute 85

Statute Court Government Administrative Law 85