SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 4, 2022

Cochran present a frontal assault on the traditional framework under which federal courts have entertained complaints about federal agencies. Share Monday’s arguments in Axon Enterprise v. Federal Trade Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission v.

Statute 116

Statute Entertainment Court Administrative Law 116

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 2, 2022

Texas Entertainment Association, Inc. City of Oakland, California v. Oakland Raiders. Disclosure : Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.

Government 101

Government Statute Cause of Action Entertainment 101

Constitutional Law Reporter

JUNE 4, 2021

Saul, 593 U.S. _ (2021) , that the principles of issue exhaustion do not require Social Security disability claimants to argue at the agency level that the administrative law judges hearing their disability claims were unconstitutionally appointed. Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Facts of the Case. Thereafter, the U.S.

Statute 52

Statute Administrative Law Entertainment Court 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 8, 2024

The Court’s Chevron decision established a bedrock principle of administrative law. ” Following the decision, several appellate state courts have held that the self-executing nature of the Takings Clause requires them to entertain claims directly under the Clause without the need for statutory authorization. 837 (1984).

Statute 52

Statute Cause of Action Entertainment Court 52

Patently O

JUNE 17, 2024

Five amicus briefs were recently filed in support of the petitioner, arguing that Supreme Court review is warranted to correct the Federal Circuit’s erroneous decision, arguing that the Federal Circuit’s interpretation of Section 2(b)(2) is flawed and undermines important principles of administrative law.

Entertainment 45

Entertainment Construction Work From Home Statute 45

Constitutional Law Reporter

MAY 30, 2023

In such actions where the Commission elects to institute administrative proceedings to address statutory violations, it typically delegates the initial adjudication to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) with authority to resolve motions, hold a hearing, and then issue a decision.

Court 52

Court Constitutional Law Entertainment Administrative Law 52

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 14, 2023

The noncitizens appearing before them face a host of daunting challenges — language barriers, financial strain, lack of legal assistance, and years-long delays — before they can entertain any hope of resolving their immigration status. Against this rather bleak backdrop comes the low-profile case of Santos-Zacaria v.

Immigration 89

Immigration Court Government Statute 89