Walmart Blocks DOJ Proceedings Over Immigration Records
Law 360
MARCH 25, 2024
The federal government cannot continue pursuing proceedings before the U.S.
Law 360
MARCH 25, 2024
The federal government cannot continue pursuing proceedings before the U.S.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 24, 2021
Garland , 20-979 , which seems a likely grant, because the government, as respondent, agrees that there is a circuit split and review is warranted on one of the questions presented. citizen for a benefit under state law. The court also has a pair of new administrative law cases, both captioned American Hospital Association v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 1, 2021
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with the federal government in a dispute over when federal courts can treat asylum seekers’ testimony as credible. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, which had previously taken asylum seekers’ testimony as credible when reviewing cases where immigration courts were silent on applicants’ credibility.
JURIST
FEBRUARY 25, 2021
The main issue before the court is”[w]hether a court of appeals may conclusively presume that an asylum applicant’s testimony is credible and true whenever an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals adjudicates an application without making an explicit adverse credibility determination.” Wilkinson v.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 14, 2023
Share The nation’s immigration courts are breaking under the cumulative weight of a byzantine statutory scheme, chronic understaffing, and insurmountable case backlogs. The case arose from the government’s attempt to deport Leon Santos-Zacaria, a 34-year-old transgender woman and citizen of Guatemala.
Law 360
JUNE 8, 2021
workers based on their citizenship by hoarding thousands of jobs for temporary visa holders, an administrative law judge has ruled, finding that the Executive Office for Immigration Review is the correct forum for the federal government's allegations. Facebook Inc. must face claims that it discriminated against U.S.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 29, 2023
Rahimi , which involves a petition for review by the federal government, strikes me as a particularly likely candidate for review. The federal government now asks the justices to weigh in on the case, arguing that the domestic violence ban is constitutional. That last case, United States v. That’s all for this term.
Let's personalize your content