article thumbnail

Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal agencies

SCOTUSBlog

Share In a major ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday cut back sharply on the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws. By a vote of 6-3, the justices overruled their landmark 1984 decision in Chevron v.

Court 145
article thumbnail

Illumina’s Acquisition of GRAIL: A Comparison of the Outcomes

Fordham Law News

Illumina”), a global genetic testing company, acquired GRAIL LLC (“Grail”), a healthcare start-up that develops early cancer detection tests based on sequencing technologies. [1] In September 2022, Administrative Law Judge Chappell dismissed the FTC’s charges against Illumina. [11] 6] Merger , Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Pharmacists in Florida (and Elsewhere): Waive Prescribing Red Flags at Your Peril

FDA Law Blog

District Court for the District of Texas on Zarzamora Healthcare LLC for repeatedly dispensing opioids and other controlled substances “by filling prescriptions while ignoring red flags.” The Coconut Grove decision introduces no new red flags, but further clarifies DEA’s expectations, especially in the context of Florida’s standard of care.

article thumbnail

Canada health authority proposes warning labels on individual cigarettes

JURIST

Health Canada Friday proposed a regulation mandating warning labels on individual cigarettes and cigars. The proposed regulations would place “health-related messages that are memorable, noticeable and impactful” on each cigarette, covering at least 75 percent of the surface area.

article thumbnail

In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies

SCOTUSBlog

If this lawsuit is allowed to go forward, the administration warns, it will mean that any state could “sue the federal government about virtually any policy.”. And they launch a broader attack on U.S. immigration policy generally, contending that it has created an “unmitigated disaster” at the U.S.-Mexico Mexico border.

article thumbnail

Divided court declines to reinstate Biden’s immigration guidelines, sets case for argument this fall

SCOTUSBlog

Like Texas and Louisiana, they emphasized that the new policy “continues to impose significant costs on the States, including billions of dollars in new expenses relating to law enforcement, education, and healthcare programs.” But they also launched a broader attack on U.S.

article thumbnail

Divided By Principle: How Justices Barrett And Jackson Are Shaping The Future Of Constitutional Law

Above The Law

Justice Barrett : 929 words Justice Barretts questioning primarily sought to clarify legal nuances surrounding the conscience protections for healthcare workers, the standing of associations in legal challenges, and the implications of regulations related to abortion and its associated medical procedures.