Remove Administrative Law Remove Healthcare Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal agencies

SCOTUSBlog

Share In a major ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday cut back sharply on the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws. By a vote of 6-3, the justices overruled their landmark 1984 decision in Chevron v.

Court 145
article thumbnail

Divided court declines to reinstate Biden’s immigration guidelines, sets case for argument this fall

SCOTUSBlog

The justices left in place a district-court ruling striking down the policy, which means that the Biden administration cannot implement it while it waits for the Supreme Court to hear argument and issue a decision. immigration policy generally, describing a “corrosive disrespect” by DHS for the rule of law and characterizing the U.S.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Divided By Principle: How Justices Barrett And Jackson Are Shaping The Future Of Constitutional Law

Above The Law

Justice Barrett : 929 words Justice Barretts questioning primarily sought to clarify legal nuances surrounding the conscience protections for healthcare workers, the standing of associations in legal challenges, and the implications of regulations related to abortion and its associated medical procedures.

article thumbnail

Will You Survive? How Trump’s Upheaval is Reshaping Your Legal Career”

The Estrin Report

Some of the most significant areas include: Regulatory Changes The deregulatory agenda in healthcare, finance, and environmental law has introduced significant uncertainty. These appointments are already influencing rulings on key areas, including administrative law, corporate litigation, and constitutional law.

Legal 176