Remove Administrative Law Remove Illinois Remove Immigration
article thumbnail

Immigration, takings, administrative law and the kitchen sink

SCOTUSBlog

(He might have had to answer some more difficult questions, though, since he was even then seeking to regularize his immigration status after entering the United States unlawfully.) citizen for a benefit under state law. City of Chicago, Illinois , 20-1214 , petitioner Fred Eychaner owned property in Chicago’s “River West” area.

article thumbnail

Litigation continues over public charge immigration rule

SCOTUSBlog

Last term, the court dismissed as improvidently granted, or “DIG”ed , a case brought by Republican-controlled states challenging the government’s repeal of a Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule. Cook County, Illinois. A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. In Texas v.

article thumbnail

Justices probe states’ effort to defend Trump immigration rule after Biden stopped defending it in court

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. alleging that the repeal of the law violated federal administrative law.