article thumbnail

Justices Consider Making It Easier to Challenge Regulatory Power of Federal Agencies

Constitutional Law Reporter

Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. Axon Enterprise, Inc. Talevski : The case seeks to resolve a split in the lower courts on whether to allow private suits for damages to enforce rights created under federal spending clause legislation.

article thumbnail

In family’s lawsuit against public nursing home, court revisits private rights of action and the spending clause

SCOTUSBlog

VCR is a government nursing facility in Indiana owned by petitioner Health and Hospital Corp., A state administrative law judge found one late-2016 transfer to have violated FNHRA and ordered Talevski returned to VCR; the family chose to move him to a different facility. a municipal entity.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more

SCOTUSBlog

The actuarial board did not adopt a binding definition until 2015 — 13 years after CMS promulgated the regulation. The company faced a series of demands from the FTC it viewed as unreasonable. rescheduled before the Nov. 10 and Jan. 7 conferences; relisted after the Jan. 14 conference).

Statute 102
article thumbnail

As Jurisprudence Under Loper Bright Develops, Early Scorecard is Mixed

FDA Law Blog

Koblitz & JP Ellison — Back in July, the United States Supreme Court turned the world of administrative law on its head, adding new layers of judicial oversight to what might have previously been thought of as fairly non-descript Federal agency functions. By John W.M. Claud & Sara W. One of those cases was Loper Bright v.

Statute 64