Remove Administrative Law Remove Indiana Remove Laws
article thumbnail

In family’s lawsuit against public nursing home, court revisits private rights of action and the spending clause

SCOTUSBlog

Talevski , to be argued Tuesday, returns the court to the question of when federal law is subject to private enforcement. 1983 — which allows private suits for state and local deprivations of rights secured by federal law—to enforce federal statutes enacted under Congress’ spending clause power. a municipal entity.

article thumbnail

Justices Consider Making It Easier to Challenge Regulatory Power of Federal Agencies

Constitutional Law Reporter

Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. The case involves personal jurisdiction over corporations, specifically the constitutionality of state laws requiring corporations operating within their boundaries to consent to personal jurisdiction when they register to do business in those states. Axon Enterprise, Inc.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more

SCOTUSBlog

Morrissey-Berru , under which employees deemed “ministers” of religious institutions are not covered by various employment and discrimination laws. Federal Trade Commission , 21-86 , involves the manufacturer of the law-enforcement device immortalized in the formerly trademarked phrase, “ Don’t tase me, bro! Axon Enterprise, Inc.

Statute 101
article thumbnail

As Jurisprudence Under Loper Bright Develops, Early Scorecard is Mixed

FDA Law Blog

Koblitz & JP Ellison — Back in July, the United States Supreme Court turned the world of administrative law on its head, adding new layers of judicial oversight to what might have previously been thought of as fairly non-descript Federal agency functions. Of course, Loper Bright wasn’t the only blockbuster admin law case this year.

Statute 64