Remove Administrative Law Remove Indiana Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

Justices Consider Making It Easier to Challenge Regulatory Power of Federal Agencies

Constitutional Law Reporter

Two of the cases involve whether litigants must wait for administrative proceedings to conclude before challenging the authority of federal agencies in federal court. Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in five cases last week. Axon Enterprise, Inc.

article thumbnail

Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more

SCOTUSBlog

The actuarial board did not adopt a binding definition until 2015 — 13 years after CMS promulgated the regulation. The company faced a series of demands from the FTC it viewed as unreasonable. rescheduled before the Nov. 10 and Jan. 7 conferences; relisted after the Jan. 14 conference).

Statute 100
article thumbnail

As Jurisprudence Under Loper Bright Develops, Early Scorecard is Mixed

FDA Law Blog

Koblitz & JP Ellison — Back in July, the United States Supreme Court turned the world of administrative law on its head, adding new layers of judicial oversight to what might have previously been thought of as fairly non-descript Federal agency functions. By John W.M. Claud & Sara W. One of those cases was Loper Bright v.

Statute 64