Remove Administrative Law Remove Kentucky Remove Laws
article thumbnail

New year comings and goings

SquirePattonBoggs

Ben Beaton, my appellate practice co-chair who often graced these pages, was sworn in last month as a US District Judge for the Western District of Kentucky. You can read about Keith’s deep experience in appellate and administrative law and his impressive background here and here. We’re kicking off 2021 with some exciting news.

article thumbnail

When do legal observers at protests get First Amendment protection?

SCOTUSBlog

United States 23-310 Issue : Whether the administrative law principles articulated in Kisor v. Texas 23-248 Issue : Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision that James Broadnax failed to establish a prima facie equal protection claim conflicts with this court’s decision in Batson v. Steelman v. Ratzloff v.

Legal 102
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

The last grants of October Term 2022?

SCOTUSBlog

22-510 Issue : Whether, when officers put a handcuffed and shackled person face-down on the floor and pushed into his back until he died, they are they entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law because the person struggled to breathe before dying. Louis, Mo. , relisted after the June 22 conference) N.S.

article thumbnail

Justice Breyer and Parents Involved

SCOTUSBlog

Lincoln Caplan is a senior research scholar and a visiting lecturer in law at Yale Law School and also teaches in Yale’s English and political science departments. Professors at the event reflected on opinions about administrative law, free speech, patents, and other topics. Seattle School District No.

article thumbnail

Justices allow federal anti-doping horse racing law to stay in effect for now

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court on Monday allowed a federal law intended to standardize anti-doping and safety regulations in horse racing to remain in place while a challenge to that law plays out. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in New Orleans, ruled in July that key parts of the law are unconstitutional.

Laws 115
article thumbnail

Justices probe states’ effort to defend Trump immigration rule after Biden stopped defending it in court

SCOTUSBlog

The 2019 rule at the center of the case broadened the definition of “public charge,” a term in immigration law for people who are ineligible for a green card if the government believes that they are likely to rely too heavily on government aid. alleging that the repeal of the law violated federal administrative law.