article thumbnail

NFTs And The Law: What Do I Actually Own?

LawTechnologyToday

Julian Pipolo is an Australasian lawyer working at a top-tier firm predominantly in administrative law. Time would be better spent trying to understand and take advantage of a burgeoning market. About the Author.

Laws 140
article thumbnail

Women of Legal Tech: Julie Saltman

LawTechnologyToday

Julie founded Standd after over a decade practicing law, mostly as a trial attorney at the U.S. At DOJ, Julie served in the Tax Division, Civil Division, and Federal Programs Branch, where she handled cases raising complex regulatory and administrative law questions in federal trial and appellate courts across the US.

Legal 69
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Sky’s the Limit: How Chestek Frees the USPTO

Patently O

Chestek PLLC, a law firm run by Pamela Chestek and specializing in trademark law, challenged the domicile address rule itself, saying its imposition failed to comply with the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). licensed counsel.

article thumbnail

The Battle Over Domicile Disclosure by Trademark Applicants

Patently O

I’ll note here that Chestek PLLC is the law firm owned by trademark attorney Pam Chestek. He notes most small trademark firms would be affected by the domicile requirement, yet the USPTO never considered resulting costs.

Statute 45
article thumbnail

GWU Adjunct Law Professor Loses Worker’s Compensation Case

JonathanTurley

That history includes this notable entry of the court: “During the prehearing discovery phase, Defendants obtained nine subpoenas for Abdelhady ‘s medical and law firm records from the administrative law judge (ALJ) presiding over her claim. Id. ¶ 174.

Laws 31
article thumbnail

Democracy on Trial: Chestek and the Future of USPTO Accountability

Patently O

Five amicus briefs were recently filed in support of the petitioner, arguing that Supreme Court review is warranted to correct the Federal Circuit’s erroneous decision, arguing that the Federal Circuit’s interpretation of Section 2(b)(2) is flawed and undermines important principles of administrative law.

article thumbnail

Morning Docket: 01.10.24

Above The Law

ABC News ] * KPMG moving into the law firm world in Arizona. Law360 ] * Supreme Court gears up for another wholesale rewrite to administrative law. Bloomberg Law News ] * Smartmatic's defamation claim against Fox News is still on. appeared first on Above the Law. Reuters ] The post Morning Docket: 01.10.24