Remove Administrative Law Remove Law Firms Remove Statute
article thumbnail

The Battle Over Domicile Disclosure by Trademark Applicants

Patently O

A decision favoring the petitioner would also be seen as bolstering the Administrative Procedure Act’s notice and comment requirements. The best place to begin any analysis is probably with the statute. The key trademark statute followed by the USPTO is the 1946 Lanham Act. ” 15 U.S.C. 1051(a)(2).

Statute 45
article thumbnail

The Sky’s the Limit: How Chestek Frees the USPTO

Patently O

Chestek PLLC, a law firm run by Pamela Chestek and specializing in trademark law, challenged the domicile address rule itself, saying its imposition failed to comply with the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). licensed counsel. ” 5 U.S.C. §

article thumbnail

Democracy on Trial: Chestek and the Future of USPTO Accountability

Patently O

Five amicus briefs were recently filed in support of the petitioner, arguing that Supreme Court review is warranted to correct the Federal Circuit’s erroneous decision, arguing that the Federal Circuit’s interpretation of Section 2(b)(2) is flawed and undermines important principles of administrative law.