This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
To answer this, I combined full-text analysis of opinions with voting data, legal metadata, and case structure. Supreme Court Database (such as cited constitutional amendments or statutory bases), I clustered decisions not just by linguistic similarity, but by legal substance.
citizens to anyone who has not “passed all background checks and security clearances and taken all information security training called for in federal statutes and Treasury Department regulations” and ordered any such person who has already copied that data to delete it pending the full hearing on February 14. It’s Q.E.D.
This post is the first of a new Climate Law Blog series, 100 Days of Trump 2.0 , in which the Sabin Center offers reflections on the first hundred days of President Trumps second term across a variety of climate-related topics. On January 20, 2025, Inauguration Day, the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law launched the Climate Backtracker.
Accusations of her being a DEI judge and a rattled law professor have flooded social media, with figures like Mike Davis and Laura Loomer leading the charge. CNN noted that prominent legal figures like Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society have argued that the criticism is an overreaction to a procedural ruling, not a substantive one.
Facial challenges to the new EO are likely to present similar claims and to confront the same legal hurdles that ultimately blocked lawsuits challenging EO 13771. climate litigation database documents two facial challenges to the first Trump administrations EO 13771. Violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
In a series of recent decisions, federal courts across the United States have addressed a range of significant legal issues, from civil rights and constitutional law to administrative authority and criminal justice. Fontes , which involved election law and constitutional questions, and Foote v. Other Areas: 15 points.
(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) Supreme Court oral arguments are more than just legal debatestheyre a high-stakes battleground where justices reveal their philosophies, test the strength of arguments, and sometimes, subtly try to persuade their colleagues. She also considers strategic behavior in shaping legal outcomes.
The US Supreme Court Thursday held that Social Security disability claimants are not bound by the issue-exhaustion requirement in administrativelaw judge (ALJ) hearings. Issue exhaustion is the principle that parties in an administrative review first raise an issue with the agency before bringing the matter to federal court.
Under § 2255, federal inmates can collaterally challenge their convictions on any ground cognizable on collateral review, with successive attacks limited to certain claims indicating “factual innocence” or relying on “constitutional law decisions made retroactive” by the Supreme Court. ” Jones v. Cochran is.
a case that intersects patent law, administrativelaw and the separation of powers. Justice Sonia Sotomayor expressed concern that if administrativelaw judges were considered inferior officers, they would be subjected to total presidential control. Arthrex, Inc.,
So far, the country has adopted several laws to strengthen the legal framework towards achieving these goals. These suits were brought forward through a unique legal mechanism called ‘ Acción de Cumplimiento ’ (roughly translated as compliance action). Among the main legalstatutes are: Law 164 of 1994 on the UNFCCC.
Share In a major ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday cut back sharply on the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws. Kagan predicted that Friday’s ruling “will cause a massive shock to the legal system.”
The Federal Circuit has agreed that Kevin Correll’s 5-year suspension from patent law practice should move forward. Unfortunately, the per curiam decision appears poorly reasoned and seems to lack sufficient legal grounding. I would suggest compensation as a distinguishing mark applies for the parallel statute 18 U.S.C. §
The relevant statute , regulating disability benefits, provides that “the United States will pay [compensation] to any veteran” who is “disabled” as a result of (1) “personal injury suffered or disease contracted in line of duty,” or (2) “aggravation of a preexisting injury suffered or disease contracted in line of duty.” military veterans.
Talevski , to be argued Tuesday, returns the court to the question of when federal law is subject to private enforcement. 1983 — which allows private suits for state and local deprivations of rights secured by federal law—to enforce federal statutes enacted under Congress’ spending clause power.
The Chevron doctrine, a pillar of administrativelaw, also looms large in the case. Natural Resources Defense Council , determines when a federal court must defer to an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers. That doctrine, first applied in 1984 in Chevron U.S.A. The Chevron analysis involves two steps.
Now, to be clear, the legal issue in this case has little to do with the propriety of Starbucks’ opposition to the union organizers. The case here involves administrative proceedings under the National Labor Relations Act. The legal question for the justices is crisp and easy to explain. Starbucks’ reply is scathing.
Share On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument on a Medicare case that will have significant financial consequences for safety-net hospitals and could have implications for the Chevron doctrine , a core principle of administrativelaw. At its core, the case, Becerra v.
In Monday’s oral argument, Paul Clement, on behalf of Axon, stated that the company is “challenging the constitutionality of statutes that insulate agency officials” and violate due process rights by “denying access to courts.”
It comes out of a corner of the legal world that was utterly unknown to me a year ago. The Defense Base Act is a federal statute that gives a worker’s compensation-like benefit to employees of US government and military contractors injured at work overseas. If so, is the administrativelaw judge a judicial authority?
837 (1984), courts must defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute that the agency is charged with administering, even if they are inclined to rule another way. The Court’s decision in Chevron is one of the most frequently cited administrativelaw decisions. In Loper Bright Enterprises v.
Stark reversed the TTAB’s cancellation order, finding the statute only permits cancellation for fraudulent acts taken while obtaining the registration , not for establishing incontestability. The dispute here involves two adjacent provisions of the Federal Trademark statute known as the Lanham Act of 1946 (as amended).
Chestek centered around amendments made to trademark regulations in 2019 requiring that applicants provide their domicile address, defined as their permanent legal residence or principal place of business — mailing address is insufficient. Under the statute, an agency must publish notice of proposed rules prior to them becoming law.
A decision favoring the petitioner would also be seen as bolstering the Administrative Procedure Act’s notice and comment requirements. The best place to begin any analysis is probably with the statute. The key trademark statute followed by the USPTO is the 1946 Lanham Act. ” 15 U.S.C. 1051(a)(2). 37 C.F.R. §
The FCC had a large staff of AdministrativeLaw Judges who heard these cases, and they were usually quite busy. The process by which the ALJ conducts the hearing is set out in the statute and by FCC rules. Usually, the FCC will have its own attorneys playing a part in the case, conducting discovery (e.g.
Here is a recap of the latest customs and international trade law news: Customs and Border Protection (CBP). currency reporting laws. . 7) of the presiding administrativelaw judge (‘‘ALJ’’), finding respondent Top Golf Equipment Co. United States Department of State (DOS). Limited (‘‘Top Golf’’) in default.
Orthwein distinguished professor of law at Washington University in St. He is coauthor of a casebook on administrativelaw and has written many articles on that subject. There has never been any mystery about the jurisprudential premises of Justice Stephen Breyer’s approach to issues of public law. Similarly, in Lucia v.
For roughly 40 years, administrativelaw in the United States has adhered to the Chevron doctrine, so named for the Supreme Court’s ruling in Chevron U.S.A., That decision established that courts should defer to the interpretations of federal agencies when it comes to ambiguous legalstatutes.
Both cases present the question whether statutes that authorize appellate courts to review final agency adjudications implicitly strip district courts of jurisdiction over constitutional challenges to those proceedings. The next two relists raise a related question: whether a habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. Federal Trade Commission.
Below, we provide a high-level summary of the Final Guidance, focusing on the legal and regulatory updates from the May 2023 draft guidance. We do not address the technical and administrative details of the Discount Program here. The manufacturer will have 60 days to appeal the CMP before an administrativelaw judge (ALJ).
The noncitizens appearing before them face a host of daunting challenges — language barriers, financial strain, lack of legal assistance, and years-long delays — before they can entertain any hope of resolving their immigration status. Against this rather bleak backdrop comes the low-profile case of Santos-Zacaria v.
Legal Services Alabama, Inc. , 22-510 Issue : Whether, when officers put a handcuffed and shackled person face-down on the floor and pushed into his back until he died, they are they entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law because the person struggled to breathe before dying. That last case, United States v. Louis, Mo. ,
Cochran , the justices will decide whether federal district courts have the power to consider claims challenging the constitutionality of the commission’s administrativelaw proceedings. In Securities and Exchange Commission v. The case is sufficiently similar to Axon Enterprise, Inc. Breckon , pending the outcome in Jones.
But Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, writing for the dissenting liberal bloc, warned that the decision could have “staggering” implications, particularly in light of the court’s decision on June 28 eliminating the doctrine of deference to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of the laws that it administers.
The law would mesh with corporate climate disclosure regulations elsewhere, particularly in Europe, and would therefore represent a significant step toward assuring the accuracy, trustworthiness, and transparency of corporate climate performance reporting. 4] The new corporate climate disclosure bills may well continue that tradition.
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving the deference that courts should give to federal agencies’ interpretations of the laws that they administer. From health care to finance to environmental pollutants, administrative agencies use highly trained experts to interpret and carry out federal laws.
Here is a recap of the latest customs and international trade law news: FDA. The complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. On May 9, 2022, the FDA issued a Constituent Update stating that Glanbia Performance Nutrition (Manufacturing), Inc.
The same law is at the center of Environmental Protection Agency v. The Supreme Court recently invalidated a removal restriction for an agency headed by a single official in Seila Law LLC v. The Bruen test, the state court added, was “fuzzy,” “backward-looking,” and “unravels durable law.” Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.
In early 2023, an ITC administrativelaw judge (ALJ) issued its initial determination that Apple was in violation of Section 337 of the 1930 Tariff Act by importing/selling the watches using. Under the statute, the exclusion order then goes to the US President who has power to veto the the exclusion order. 3d 1559 (Fed.
The Scramble to Identify Major Questions in AdministrativeLaw In its June 2022 decision in West Virginia v. Following the West Virginia decision, analysis of the MQD has proliferated as legal scholars grapple with the doctrine’s lack of definition. However, it objected to the EPA’s interpretation of its authorizing statute.
Ultimately, the SEC will have to anticipate these types of legal challenges in finalizing a durable rule. When the SEC initially proposed the rule, the Supreme Court had not yet embraced the Major Questions Doctrine (MQD), a new doctrine that constrains the function of the administrative state. Other legal challenges have also arisen.
Second, the majority said nothing about the legal merits of Trump's attempt to restrict birthright citizenship by presidential fiat, which remains just as constitutionally dubious as it always was. born children will qualify for that status only if at least one parent is a citizen or lawful permanent resident. citizenship.
The aspects I examined in each decision were the case details, outcome, area(s) of law, and the ideological leaning that each decision conveys. The district court had initially dismissed the state law claim (Unruh Act) due to its concern about the burden of handling such cases in federal court. Trump #1 Arroyo v.
The court’s grant suggests the court may be poised to narrow the scope of standing for members of Congress to sue to enforce statutes. FDIC , involving separation of powers and administrativelaw claims. The court also noted probable jurisdiction for a one-time relist of a mandatory appeal in a redistricting case, Alexander v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content