This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Paralegals can avoid the unauthorized practice of law (UPL) by becoming familiar with their state’s rules. Rules against UPL specify that paralegals (or anyone who is not licensed to practice law) cannot provide attorney-client services to people, among other prohibitions. What is UPL? Three Things Paralegals Should Avoid.
Latty Distinguished Professor of Law and Co-Director, Center for Innovation Policy at Duke Law In a flurry of recent decisions, the Supreme Court has continued its skepticism of administrative agencies. Notably, the 2016 patent law case of Cuozzo v. Meanwhile, Justice Gorsuch’s 2024 Ohio v. Guest post by Arti K.
The two groups of challengers in the consolidated cases are a coalition of twenty-seven States led by Ohio and a coalition of twenty-six business associations represented by Lehotsky Keller LLP. Will these cases end up, like Overton Park , as staples of American law-school casebooks?
Share This week we highlight cert petitions (and one original action ) that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether New Jersey can withdraw from its Waterfront Commission Compact with New York concerning governance and law enforcement over the Port of New York and New Jersey. In New York v. However, the U.S.
Share Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority , which the Supreme Court will hear on Monday, involves the collective-bargaining rights of “dual status” military technicians who work in the Ohio National Guard. The union filed another unfair-labor-practice charge with the FLRA in April 2017.
The FCC has already issued such an extension three times since the initial compliance deadline of May 26, 2015, as the NAB contends that there still is no workable technology that can perform the functions required by the rule (see our Broadcast Law Blog article here from the last extension 5 years ago).
Improving justice system outcomes has long been considered the responsibility of judges, probation, jail administrators, law enforcement, and other justice-system stakeholders. Cuyahoga County, Ohio. The ten sites involved in this initiative are: Albemarle County and the City of Charlottesville, Va. Lake County, Colo.
The FCC has already issued such an extension three times since the initial compliance deadline of May 26, 2015, as the NAB contends that there still is no workable technology that can perform the functions required by the rule (see our Broadcast Law Blog article here from the last extension 5 years ago).
Georgetown University Law Center and its Supreme Court Institute gave a tribute to Stewart, who was been with the Department of Justice for more than 30 years, at its annual end-of-arguments reception in April. Justice Clarence Thomas delivers the 7-2 decision in the labor dispute Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v.
To enforce these laws, Congress created the SEC. It granted the agency the power to regulate investors through either lawsuits in federal court or internal hearings in front of an administrativelaw judge, or ALJ. Under federal law, investors may challenge only final internal decisions by the SEC in the courts of appeals.
Here is a recap of the latest customs and international trade law news: FDA. International Trade Commission on March 29, 2022, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Apeks, LLC of Johnstown, Ohio. Glanbia), along with 10 other companies, was illegally selling adulterated dietary supplements. Power Steel).
If the lower courts decision allowing RJR Vapors case to go forward stands, the FDA says, other manufacturers will also try to get around the restrictions that federal law imposes on where such challenges can be filed. The law at the center of the case is the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.
Koblitz & JP Ellison — Back in July, the United States Supreme Court turned the world of administrativelaw on its head, adding new layers of judicial oversight to what might have previously been thought of as fairly non-descript Federal agency functions. Of course, Loper Bright wasn’t the only blockbuster admin law case this year.
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit rejected the Biden administration’s request to put Tipton’s ruling on hold while it appeals. In a separate case, Arizona, Montana, and Ohio also challenged the policy in a federal district court in Ohio. Tipton also lacked the power to issue his ruling, Prelogar contended.
They prefer to falsely vilify the Democratic opposition and President Biden’s “crime family” while blaming an imaginary “deep state” and very real federal and state judicial departments for “weaponizing” the discriminatory wheels of law enforcement against the former president.
Accusations of her being a DEI judge and a rattled law professor have flooded social media, with figures like Mike Davis and Laura Loomer leading the charge. In another environmental case, Ohio v. Empire Health Foundation (2021) and Ohio v. Texas (2021) and Ohio v. In Becerra v. EPA (2023), while Bittner v.
An Ohio-based supplier of aircraft parts and three employees were charged for an illicit export scheme involving Russia. A FMC administrativelaw judge ordered Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) to pay $16 million in civil penalties for violating U.S. shipping laws. The intent of the form is to streamline the process.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content