SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 4, 2022

Brent Newton is a visiting professor of law at Penn State-Dickinson School of Law. He previously taught seminars on Breyer’s jurisprudence at American University Washington College of Law. These pragmatists consider the real-world consequences of the court’s decisions and value stare decisis and narrow rulings.

Stare Decisis 92

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Government Court 92

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 11, 2022

Both cases arise in the context of administrative proceedings brought by independent enforcement agencies against regulated parties — Axon by the Federal Trade Commission, and Cochran by the Securities and Exchange Commission. relisted after the April 29 conference). Returning Relists. Texas , 21-6001.

Stare Decisis 84

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Statute Government 84

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 20, 2022

Cochran , the justices will decide whether federal district courts have the power to consider claims challenging the constitutionality of the commission’s administrative law proceedings. In Securities and Exchange Commission v. The case is sufficiently similar to Axon Enterprise, Inc.

Stare Decisis 127

Stare Decisis Court Lawyer Lawyers 127

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving the deference that courts should give to federal agencies’ interpretations of the laws that they administer. From health care to finance to environmental pollutants, administrative agencies use highly trained experts to interpret and carry out federal laws.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145