SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 26, 2023

This week, we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether words displayed on hats worn at a protest by legal observers – attorneys who document the treatment of demonstrators’ civil rights – can entitle them to sue police who suppressed the rally. Louis, Missouri. Ratzloff v.

Legal 102

Legal Legal Attorney Lawyers 102

SquirePattonBoggs

DECEMBER 23, 2021

The challengers in the other case are a coalition of ten states led by Missouri. We say “almost” because the one (and only) time the full Court heard oral argument on an emergency stay application was way back in December 1970 in the classic administrative-law case of Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v.

Court 81

Court Law School Administrative Law Legal 81

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 29, 2023

Louis, Missouri , 22-193 Issue : Whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination as to all “terms, conditions, or privileges of employment,” or whether its reach is limited to discriminatory employer conduct that courts determine causes materially significant disadvantages for employees. New Relists Muldrow v.

Immigration 83

Immigration Court Government Laws 83

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation. District Judge Drew Tipton agreed with the states that the policy violates federal law and vacated it nationwide.

Immigration 107

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 107

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

The court found that the Commission adequately explained its rationale for rejecting the dollar figure adopted by the administrative law judge. Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Biden Administration Asked Missouri Federal Court to Dismiss States’ Challenge to Actions on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases. Missouri v.

Court 46

Court Litigating Litigation Statute 46

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 7, 2022

After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. In June 2021, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas of the Department of Homeland Security issued a decision terminating the policy.

Laws 131

Laws Immigration Court Legal 131