Remove Administrative Law Remove Legal Remove Statute Remove Texas
article thumbnail

Challenges to administrative action and retroactive relief for prisoners

SCOTUSBlog

Both cases present the question whether statutes that authorize appellate courts to review final agency adjudications implicitly strip district courts of jurisdiction over constitutional challenges to those proceedings. The next two relists raise a related question: whether a habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. Federal Trade Commission.

article thumbnail

Customs and Weekly Trade Snapshot

Customs & International Trade Law

District Court for the Western District of Texas, Claudia Delgadillo (‘‘Delgadillo’’) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. USITC received a complaint on September 16, 2022, under the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of EDST, LLC of Lubbock, Texas and Quext IoT, LLC of Lubbock, Texas. Limited (‘‘Top Golf’’) in default.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Allegations of racial bias in a death penalty trial

SCOTUSBlog

Cochran , the justices will decide whether federal district courts have the power to consider claims challenging the constitutionality of the commission’s administrative law proceedings. Texas , 21-6001. Issues : (1) Whether, on remand, the Texas court rejected the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Andrus v.

article thumbnail

The last grants of October Term 2022?

SCOTUSBlog

A state court in Texas entered a restraining order against the defendant in the case, Zackey Rahimi, in early 2020. Legal Services Alabama, Inc. , Securities and Exchange Commission , 22-991 Issue : Whether, under special review statute 15 U.S.C. § That last case, United States v.

article thumbnail

The SEC’s Final Climate Disclosure Rule Must Respond to Emerging Legal Risks

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Ultimately, the SEC will have to anticipate these types of legal challenges in finalizing a durable rule. When the SEC initially proposed the rule, the Supreme Court had not yet embraced the Major Questions Doctrine (MQD), a new doctrine that constrains the function of the administrative state. Other legal challenges have also arisen.

Legal 59
article thumbnail

“Remain in Mexico” and Texas’ anti-abortion law

SCOTUSBlog

Texas presents the latest stage in the Biden administration’s attempt to unwind the Trump administration’s “remain in Mexico” policy. The Biden administration sought a stay of that order in the Supreme Court, but the justices rejected that request over the dissent of Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan.

Laws 125
article thumbnail

Justices delve into a trio of thorny issues in states’ challenge to federal immigration policy

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation. Texas and Louisiana went to federal court in Texas to challenge the policy. Judd Stone, solicitor general of Texas, argues for the state.