This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In June 2022, I launched The Legal Accountability Project (LAP), the first and only nonprofit working full-time to ensure that judicial law clerks have positive clerkship experiences, while extending support and resources to those who do not. Louis School of Law a few years ago, that Id be an award-winning legal technology founder.
This week, we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether words displayed on hats worn at a protest by legal observers – attorneys who document the treatment of demonstrators’ civil rights – can entitle them to sue police who suppressed the rally. Police ordered the protesters to disperse. Broadnax v.
District Court for the Western District of Texas, Claudia Delgadillo (‘‘Delgadillo’’) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. USITC received a complaint on September 16, 2022, under the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of EDST, LLC of Lubbock, Texas and Quext IoT, LLC of Lubbock, Texas. Limited (‘‘Top Golf’’) in default.
Both cases arise in the context of administrative proceedings brought by independent enforcement agencies against regulated parties — Axon by the Federal Trade Commission, and Cochran by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Texas , 21-6001. relisted after the April 29 conference). Securities and Exchange Commission v.
Cochran , the justices will decide whether federal district courts have the power to consider claims challenging the constitutionality of the commission’s administrativelaw proceedings. Texas , 21-6001. Issues : (1) Whether, on remand, the Texas court rejected the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Andrus v.
New Patently-O Law Journal article by David Boundy , a partner at Potomac Law Group, PLLC. Mr. Boundy practices at the intersection of patent and administrativelaw, and consults with other firms on court and administrative agency proceedings, including PTAB trials and appeals. By Jason Rantanen.
A state court in Texas entered a restraining order against the defendant in the case, Zackey Rahimi, in early 2020. Legal Services Alabama, Inc. , That last case, United States v. Rahimi , which involves a petition for review by the federal government, strikes me as a particularly likely candidate for review.
DOC , through the Office of Trade and Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’) of the International Trade Administration, has received an application for an amended Export Trade Certificate of Review (‘‘Certificate’’). . DOC announced on January 6, 2020, in the U.S. 731–TA–860 (Final). .
But the 5th Circuit wrote that this case “may … attract the [Supreme] Court’s interest” because “[i]t tees up one of the fiercest (and oldest) fights in administrativelaw: the Humphrey’s Executor ‘exception to the general ‘rule’ that lets a president remove subordinates at will.” Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C. , 30 conference.)
USITC has determined not to review two initial determinations (‘‘IDs’’) of the presiding administrativelaw judge (‘‘ALJ’’): (1) Order No. USITC hereby give notices that on October 7, 2022, the presiding administrativelaw judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. of Houston, Texas. .
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Tuesday in a clash over whether a North Carolina-based company can challenge the Food and Drug Administrations denial of its application to market e-cigarettes in the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Louisiana. The company, R.J.
After Dobbs was accepted, advocates sought to enjoin a Texaslaw that banned abortion after just six weeks. The court ruled 5-4 to allow the Texaslaw to be enforced. The Biden administration and other litigants then forced a reconsideration of that decision. Chevron USA Inc.
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to set immigration policy. Texas and Louisiana are challenging a federal policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation, arguing that it violates federal law.
The Scramble to Identify Major Questions in AdministrativeLaw In its June 2022 decision in West Virginia v. Following the West Virginia decision, analysis of the MQD has proliferated as legal scholars grapple with the doctrine’s lack of definition. Circuit, Texas v. Env’t Prot. In a case before the D.C.
The Biden administration seeks a declaration that it may cease enforcement of the “Remain in Mexico” immigration policy first implemented by former President Trump. ” The administration accuses the Fifth Circuit of ignoring “hornbook principles of administrativelaw” to reach its decision.
In 2021 the Biden Administration reversed the Trump-era rollbacks and instituted the strictest-ever vehicle GHG emissions standards in a move aimed at preventing 3.1 In 2022, Texas, along with several other states and industry groups representing fuel manufacturers (together, Petitioners), challenged EPA’s new emissions standards in court.
In a series of recent decisions, federal courts across the United States have addressed a range of significant legal issues, from civil rights and constitutional law to administrative authority and criminal justice. Area of Law: Constitutional Law, Civil Rights, Federal Authority: 25 points. Other Areas: 15 points.
Ultimately, the SEC will have to anticipate these types of legal challenges in finalizing a durable rule. When the SEC initially proposed the rule, the Supreme Court had not yet embraced the Major Questions Doctrine (MQD), a new doctrine that constrains the function of the administrative state. Other legal challenges have also arisen.
Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation. Texas and Louisiana went to federal court in Texas to challenge the policy. Judd Stone, solicitor general of Texas, argues for the state.
(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) Supreme Court oral arguments are more than just legal debatestheyre a high-stakes battleground where justices reveal their philosophies, test the strength of arguments, and sometimes, subtly try to persuade their colleagues. She also considers strategic behavior in shaping legal outcomes.
The Attorneys General of Arizona and Montana filed an amended a joint lawsuit Monday alleging that the Biden administration has violated immigration and administrativelaw. Shortly after the release of the memorandum, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sought a restraining order to delay implementation.
CNN noted that prominent legal figures like Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society have argued that the criticism is an overreaction to a procedural ruling, not a substantive one. Texas, Becerra v. Ross (2022) focused on economic regulations, examining securities fraud and state agricultural laws impact on interstate commerce.
Texas presents the latest stage in the Biden administration’s attempt to unwind the Trump administration’s “remain in Mexico” policy. The Biden administration sought a stay of that order in the Supreme Court, but the justices rejected that request over the dissent of Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan.
The court found that the Commission adequately explained its rationale for rejecting the dollar figure adopted by the administrativelaw judge. Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. BP p.l.c. , 19-1644 (4th Cir. June 22, 2021). United States , No. 19-35708 (9th Cir. June 21, 2021). June 7, 2021).
She spent the year between college and law school as a reporter and researcher at Time magazine in New York. In the 17 years following her graduation from law school, Jackson held a variety of legal jobs. She attained three federal clerkships, worked at four elite law firms, and served two stints with the Sentencing Commission.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content