This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In addition, always remember to keep in touch with your legal and regulatory advisors to make sure that you don’t overlook any regulatory deadlines that are specific to your station. Always review these dates with your legal and technical advisors, and note other dates not listed here that may be relevant to your operations.
A state administrativelaw judge found one late-2016 transfer to have violated FNHRA and ordered Talevski returned to VCR; the family chose to move him to a different facility. Talevski’s wife and legal guardian brought a Section 1983 action on his behalf against VCR, HHC, and other entities, alleging violations of his FNHRA rights.
5] For the reasons discussed below, more firms – and their legal and other advisers– should follow them. Corporate and securities law – as well as companies and their leaders acting through lobbying and politics – also have major roles to play. [9] Academic readers of this blog should too! 2] See, e.g., Jacqueline M.
But the 5th Circuit wrote that this case “may … attract the [Supreme] Court’s interest” because “[i]t tees up one of the fiercest (and oldest) fights in administrativelaw: the Humphrey’s Executor ‘exception to the general ‘rule’ that lets a president remove subordinates at will.” Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C. ,
The stakes in the case are high: The challengers argue that the current deferential standard is unconstitutional, while the Biden administration contends that overturning the existing doctrine would be a “convulsive shock to the legal system.” The doctrine at the center of the case is known as the Chevron doctrine.
Notably, the court has accepted a variety of other cases that could curtail agency authority, including West Virginia v. is a 1984 administrativelaw case that has come to embody the role of federal agencies in not just enforcing but creating law. Chevron USA Inc. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc.
(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) Supreme Court oral arguments are more than just legal debatestheyre a high-stakes battleground where justices reveal their philosophies, test the strength of arguments, and sometimes, subtly try to persuade their colleagues. She also considers strategic behavior in shaping legal outcomes.
Petitioners also argue that the potential economic and political ramifications of the standards are so great that EPA’s rule violates the so-called “major questions doctrine,” a relatively new and quickly evolving concept in administrativelaw. This doctrine was recently and prominently applied by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v.
Joe Manchin of West Virginia became the first Democrat to formally oppose her confirmation. For a further discussion of Sohn’s withdrawal and its implications for broadcast regulation, see the article on our Broadcast Law Blog, here. For more details on this matter and the legal issues associated with it, see our Blog article here.
Virginia Federal Court Said Challenge to NEPA Regulations Was Not Justiciable. Wild Virginia v. The court found that the Commission adequately explained its rationale for rejecting the dollar figure adopted by the administrativelaw judge. Animal Legal Defense Fund v. WildEarth Guardians v. Steele , No.
The Scramble to Identify Major Questions in AdministrativeLaw In its June 2022 decision in West Virginia v. The West Virginia majority opinion suggests a two-prong framework for the major questions doctrine. Nebraska , invalidating the Biden Administration’s student loan forgiveness program. Env’t Prot.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content