This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In addition, always remember to keep in touch with your legal and regulatory advisors to make sure that you don’t overlook any regulatory deadlines that are specific to your station. Always review these dates with your legal and technical advisors, and note other dates not listed here that may be relevant to your operations.
5] For the reasons discussed below, more firms – and their legal and other advisers– should follow them. Corporate and securities law – as well as companies and their leaders acting through lobbying and politics – also have major roles to play. [9] Academic readers of this blog should too! 2] See, e.g., Jacqueline M.
The stakes in the case are high: The challengers argue that the current deferential standard is unconstitutional, while the Biden administration contends that overturning the existing doctrine would be a “convulsive shock to the legal system.” The doctrine at the center of the case is known as the Chevron doctrine.
Notably, the court has accepted a variety of other cases that could curtail agency authority, including WestVirginia v. is a 1984 administrativelaw case that has come to embody the role of federal agencies in not just enforcing but creating law. Chevron USA Inc. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc.
Petitioners also argue that the potential economic and political ramifications of the standards are so great that EPA’s rule violates the so-called “major questions doctrine,” a relatively new and quickly evolving concept in administrativelaw. This doctrine was recently and prominently applied by the Supreme Court in WestVirginia v.
Joe Manchin of WestVirginia became the first Democrat to formally oppose her confirmation. For a further discussion of Sohn’s withdrawal and its implications for broadcast regulation, see the article on our Broadcast Law Blog, here. Sohn’s withdrawal came shortly before Sen. signals must take.
The Scramble to Identify Major Questions in AdministrativeLaw In its June 2022 decision in WestVirginia v. The WestVirginia majority opinion suggests a two-prong framework for the major questions doctrine. Nebraska , invalidating the Biden Administration’s student loan forgiveness program.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content