Patently O

JULY 24, 2024

Although these decisions may not have as significant an impact in patent law as in other areas, they do pose interesting puzzles with respect to stare decisis as well as agency rulemaking and discretion that will provide many litigation opportunities going forward. no standing requirement).

Stare Decisis 51

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Construction Laws 51

JURIST

JUNE 28, 2024

Though the court’s decision in Loper may contradict the stare decisi s principle of judicial continuity, the court found that some cases must involve the court “correcting [its] own mistakes.”

Stare Decisis 223

Stare Decisis Court Court Rules Litigation 223

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 11, 2022

The question is whether the United States is such a successful litigant that the court will grant review even in cases it doesn’t want the court to review. In addition, the Supreme Court held a few years back that the appointment procedures for SEC administrative law judges violate the Constitution’s appointments clause.

Stare Decisis 85

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Statute Government 85

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

In an article published in 2014, law professor Thomas Merrill suggested that the Chevron decision was not regarded as a particularly consequential one when it was issued. But in the decades since then, it became one of the most significant rulings on federal administrative law, cited by federal courts more than 18,000 times.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145