Remove Administrative Law Remove Litigation Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Patent Puzzles after the Supreme Court’s 2024 Administrative Law Cases: Stare Decisis, Rulemaking, and Discretion

Patently O

Although these decisions may not have as significant an impact in patent law as in other areas, they do pose interesting puzzles with respect to stare decisis as well as agency rulemaking and discretion that will provide many litigation opportunities going forward. A challenger wouldn’t necessarily have to hurry to the courthouse.

article thumbnail

Justices decisively reject imposing issue exhaustion on Social Security claimants

SCOTUSBlog

In this case, for example, the claimants in agency proceedings from 2013 to 2015 did not know that a 2018 decision of the Supreme Court would invalidate the SSA’s process for appointing administrative law judges, and so they did not complain about that process before the agency.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal agencies

SCOTUSBlog

Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it was reasonable. Under the APA,” Roberts concluded, “it thus remains the responsibility of the court to decide whether the law means what the agency says.”

Court 145
article thumbnail

As Jurisprudence Under Loper Bright Develops, Early Scorecard is Mixed

FDA Law Blog

Koblitz & JP Ellison — Back in July, the United States Supreme Court turned the world of administrative law on its head, adding new layers of judicial oversight to what might have previously been thought of as fairly non-descript Federal agency functions. By John W.M. Claud & Sara W. One of those cases was Loper Bright v.

Statute 62
article thumbnail

Justices divided over SEC’s ability to impose fines in administrative proceedings

SCOTUSBlog

The justices said not a word about the second challenge, and they made only one offhand comment about the third challenge, when Justice Brett Kavanaugh suggested in passing that the administrative law judges’s appointments won’t pass muster with him. T]hat’s the issue. That’s the result. The Seventh Amendment is no bar.”

article thumbnail

Justices seem receptive to opening up early challenges to agency proceedings

SCOTUSBlog

The two cases involve substantively identical statutes that govern challenges to final orders issued by the FTC and the SEC. In each case, the statutes provide that the sole method for challenging those orders is a petition for review in the court of appeals. Those are the two statutes we have. Again, what am I missing?

Statute 142
article thumbnail

Justices will assess federal labor protections for National Guard technicians

SCOTUSBlog

The guard, moreover, questioned the applicability to the technicians of various federal labor statutes, especially the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute , a 1978 law that established collective-bargaining rights for most employees of the federal government.

Statute 83