Remove Administrative Law Remove Minnesota Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Immigration, takings, administrative law and the kitchen sink

SCOTUSBlog

The government takes the position that the statute forecloses only review of discretionary decisions not to grant relief, not factual findings that are factored into those decisions.) The court also has a pair of new administrative law cases, both captioned American Hospital Association v. Fillmore County, Minnesota , 20-7028.

article thumbnail

Can Plaintiffs Challenge President Trump’s “10-to-1” Deregulation Order? A Look Back at Lawsuits Challenging the Order’s Predecessor

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The second lawsuit was filed more than two years later by California, Oregon, and Minnesota. The plaintiffs contended that EO 13771 overstepped the powers conferred on the President by the Constitution and federal statutes by requiring agencies to take actions based on factors not prescribed byand at odds withfederal statutes.

Statute 59
article thumbnail

July 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Court held that the provision used “extension” in its “temporal sense,” but that the statute did not impose a “continuity requirement” and instead allowed small refineries to apply for hardship extensions “at any time.” Minnesota Court of Appeals Upheld State Approvals for Enbridge Crude Oil Replacement Pipeline. D076956 (Cal.

Court 49