Remove Alabama Remove Constitutional Law Remove Laws
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court declines to hear SPLC defamation case challenging 1960s precedent

JURIST

The US Supreme Court Monday declined to hear a case where a Christian ministry sued the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) over being labeled a hate group. ’ ‘ New York Times and the Court’s decisions extending it were policy-driven decisions masquerading as constitutional law.’

Court 197
article thumbnail

Looking Back at the Biggest Constitutional Law Decisions of 2023

Constitutional Law Reporter

Constitutional law took center stage in many U.S. The Elections Clause does not insulate state legislatures from the ordinary exercise of state judicial review,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote, ensuring that state courts retain the authority to review election laws under state constitutions.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court Greenlights Alabama Voting Map

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court allowed Alabama to implement a congressional redistricting map that includes only one district with a majority of Black voters. While a lower court agreed with challengers that the map constitutes illegal racial gerrymandering, the Supreme Court granted a stay, effectively putting the order on hold. In Merrill v.

Court 52
article thumbnail

Vermont dispatch: Proposal 2 would remove language of slavery, indentured servitude from state constitution

JURIST

The crossed-out language is what will be removed from the constitution if Proposal 2 is adopted. According to the author of Proposal 2, Vermont constitutional law professor Peter Teachout, the amendment makes no change to substantive rights. Evidence lies in both the constitutional language and judicial precedent.

Drafting 197
article thumbnail

SCOTUS Upholds Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in Alabama Redistricting Case

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court held that challengers showed a reasonable likelihood of success on their claim that an Alabama Congressional redistricting plan likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. That new map was signed into law as HB1. The Court preliminarily enjoined Alabama from using HB1 in forthcoming elections. In Allen v.

article thumbnail

Gain Experience with Paralegal Pro Bono Work

Paralegal Bootcamp

The partner tells me that the DC partner was the head of the firm’s pro bono department, and I’d be the lead litigation paralegal on a case involving a civil rights violation in Alabama prisons. And I learned a lot about an area of law that I had never been exposed to, and never would have been exposed to, without that pro bono opportunity.

article thumbnail

Justices decline to reinstate GOP-backed congressional voting maps in North Carolina, Pennsylvania

SCOTUSBlog

Proponents of the theory, known as the “independent state legislature” theory, believe that the Constitution gives state legislatures nearly unfettered authority to write the rules for federal elections, with little or no oversight from state courts. The North Carolina case. The North Carolina dispute, Moore v. He was referring to Merrill v.