This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on Friday vacated a previous ruling that dismissed a lawsuit brought by the Oklahoma-based Muscogee (Creek) Nation, who challenged the construction of a casino in Alabama on land they claim is sacred.
A US District Court Northern District of Alabama three judge panel Tuesday tossed out the Alabama legislature’s proposed congressional map, holding that the current map is still racially gerrymandered and likely violates Section Two of the Voting Rights Act. The case, Allen v.
A panel of three federal judges Monday blocked Alabama’s new congressional district map, finding that it unlawfully disadvantages Black voters. The courtruled that lawmakers should redraw the map to include two districts with a substantial Black population, rather than one.
“Alabama will appeal rejection of congressional map to U.S. Supreme Court”: Mike Cason of Alabama Media Group has this report. ” John Fritze of USA Today reports that “ Federal court strikes down Alabama congressional maps in showdown over Black voting power.”
Governor of Alabama Kay Ivey approved a new congressional map Friday, passed by the Alabama legislature during a special session , which designates only one majority-Black district in the state. The approval is in defiance of the US Supreme Courtruling in Allen v. percent of the state’s population.
“Plaintiffs move to dismiss lawsuit that led to Alabama Supreme Court IVF decision; The couple in the final remaining lawsuit over the destruction of embryos at a Mobile facility moved to end the suit last week”: Alander Rocha of Alabama Reflector has this report.
“Shock, anger, confusion grip Alabama after courtruling on embryos”: Tim Craig and Sabrina Malhi of The Washington Post have this report. Joslin and Mary Ziegler have a Jurisprudence essay titled “ Sam Alito Is to Blame for the Alabama Supreme Court’s Devastating Anti-IVF Ruling.”
“Federal courtrulesAlabama cannot execute Joseph Smith due to his mental disability”: Hadley Hitson of The Montgomery Advertiser has this report on a unanimous per curiam opinion that a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued yesterday.
“We’ll Protect Both Life and IVF: A Senate bill to clear up confusion after an Alabama Supreme Courtruling.” The post “We’ll Protect Both Life and IVF: A Senate bill to clear up confusion after an Alabama Supreme Courtruling.” ” U.S. ” appeared first on How Appealing.
“Supreme Court Declines to Revisit Alabama Voting Map Dispute; For the second time in recent months, the Supreme Courtruled against Alabama lawmakers and their proposed congressional district map”: Abbie VanSickle of The New York Times has this report. Supreme Court. ” David G. .”
Wade led to the Alabama Supreme Courtruling that frozen embryos are children”: Jacqueline Howard of CNN has this report. Wade led to the Alabama Supreme Courtruling that frozen embryos are children” appeared first on How Appealing. “How the reversal of Roe v.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is set to consider the role of race in redistricting decisions in a case concerning Alabama’s congressional district map. The post US Supreme Court reverses Wisconsin courtruling on legislative maps appeared first on JURIST - News.
Gentry in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama with the assistance of the Alabama ACLU, Civil Rights Corps and the Southern Poverty Law Center. The lower courtruled in favor of Hester, enjoining the county from imposing cash bail amounts on defendants who could not afford them.
A US federal court on Wednesday partially blocked enforcement of an Alabama law criminalizing absentee ballot assistance. The court sided with a coalition of plaintiffs who argued the law would violate the rights of disabled, blind, and low-literacy voters. The judge enjoined several sections of Senate Bill 1 (SB1).
“The People Rooting for the End of IVF; An Alabamacourtruling that recognized an embryo as a child has put the popular fertility treatment into the center of a national ethics debate”: Elaine Godfrey of The Atlantic has this report.
“Thank the Alabama Supreme Court for its IVF decision. And in related news coverage, Kim Bellware of The Washington Post reports that “ Fourth couple sues Alabama clinic at heart of IVF courtruling.” ” The post “Thank the Alabama Supreme Court for its IVF decision.
Share Lawyers for Alabama voters urged the justices to stay out of a dispute over the state’s congressional map. Tuesday’s filings were the latest in the ongoing dispute over efforts in Alabama to draw new congressional maps in the wake of the 2020 census. Alabama came to the Supreme Court on Sept.
Share Lawyers for Alabama voters urged the justices to stay out of a dispute over the state’s congressional map. Tuesday’s filings were the latest in the ongoing dispute over efforts in Alabama to draw new congressional maps in the wake of the 2020 census. Alabama came to the Supreme Court on Sept.
As in Alabama, the people of Louisiana have the law on their side and the facts on their side. Robinson had previously been stayed while the Supreme Court deliberated in a similar case regarding Alabama, Allen v. The removal of the stay will allow a US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruling to go forward.
Several of the courts conservative justices expressed skepticism about the map and about whether the 2022 ruling on which Louisiana relied to justify the creation of a second majority-Black district in the state was actually correct, but it was unclear whether those concerns would be enough to uphold the lower courtsruling.
Again Alabama is on the wrong side of a courtruling. The post Alabama’s F You To The Supreme Court Isn’t Working Out The Way They Hoped appeared first on Above the Law.
The US Supreme Courtruled Thursday in Jones v. Jones argued that under two of the court’s recent decisions, 2012’s Miller v. Jones argued that under two of the court’s recent decisions, 2012’s Miller v. Alabama and 2016’s Montgomery v. … For most, the answer is yes.
Earlier in the litigation, the courtruled that the gerrymandering claim was “justiciable” under the New Mexico Constitution. Justiciability refers to the ability of a court to hear an issue. This is not the only gerrymandering litigation in the US that has arisen before upcoming election cycles.
Supreme Court rejects challenge to Alabama county bail system (John Kruzel, Reuters) Supreme Court won’t review North Carolina’s decision to nix license plates with Confederate flag (Jessica Gresko, The Associated Press) Where Texas redistricting lawsuits stand after U.S. Here’s the Tuesday morning read: U.S.
Share Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. We’ll be live at 9:45 a.m. The post The morning read for Friday, May 24 appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: The Supreme Court banned affirmative action–except at military academies (Code Switch, NPR) Alabama’s congressional map dilutes the power of Black voters, advocates again tell Supreme Court (Ariane de Vogue & Fredreka Schouten, CNN) Supreme Courtruling sparks fears about economic fallout (Omar Mohammed, (..)
Here’s the Friday morning read: Supreme Courtrules in favor of Black Alabama voters in unexpected defense of Voting Rights Act (Mark Sherman, The Associated Press) Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel’s in poop-themed dog toy trademark fight (Devan Cole, CNN) The Supreme Court’s Damper on the Right to Strike (E.
Supreme CourtRulings Matter Except For When They Don't: Alabama doesn't care what Roberts has to say. If You Fail The Bar, You Can Do Something Very Funny: Hoping you don't need this but it's here either way. Lawyers Are Better At Math Than Election Law Scholars: Especially the ones named Derek Muller.
The US Supreme Courtruled on Thursday that the US Constitution’s Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar the prosecution from retrying a criminal defendant if it is determined that the original trial venue was improper. Smith was tried in Florida, but he argued that the venue was improper because he lives in Alabama. In Smith v.
Additionally, the Vermont Supreme Courtruled in 1802 that once crossed over into Vermont, a slave contract from another state was unenforceable. Evidence lies in both the constitutional language and judicial precedent. Article 1 of Vermont’s Constitution states “[t]hat all persons are born equally free and independent.”
The first of what we anticipate to be many courtrulings on the CTA and FinCEN's enforcement ability, this case only enjoins FinCEN from enforcing as against the plaintiffs in this case.
The district courtruled in favor of the petitioners, and Galveston County appealed. On appeal, the Fifth Circuit said that the district court opinion was an error of law. The circuit courts are split on whether to allow allow these type of aggregate racial minority claims for Section 2 violations of the Voting Rights Act.
The Corporate Transparency Act's reporting requirements violate the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination and other constitutional provisions, libertarian think tank Cato Institute and others said Monday in urging the Eleventh Circuit to uphold an Alabama district court'sruling against the law.
Share Two years after the courtruled that a disparity in bankrupt debtors’ fees between judicial districts was impermissible, the justices on Friday ruled 6-3 that charging equal fees going forward is an adequate remedy for that disparity. Traditionally, the Bankruptcy Administrator Program tracked the fees set by the U.S.
” This District Courtruling was the center of the Supreme Court’s decision in Alexander. Under Court precedent, namely Miller v. In February, the Missouri Supreme Court upheld their congressional map over racial gerrymandering concerns. Johnson and Shaw v.
A constitutional ruling by an Alabama judicial body has the rest of the country wondering about its potentially widespread implications. We’re not talking about the Alabama Supreme Courtruling that embryos created through IVF are children , but another recent decision. Sound familiar?
Alabama State Bar Formal Opinion 2008-03 – Lawyers’ Trust Account Obligations With Regard to Retainers and Set Fees State Bar of Arizona Ethics Opinion 10-03 – Fees; Fee Agreement; Non-Refundable Fees; Flat Fees State Bar of Georgia Formal Advisory Opinion No. About the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism.
The decision follows multiple previous precedents set by the Court over the past decade that sharply limited courts’ ability to sentence a juvenile offender to life in prison without parole, the lawyers wrote. In Miller v. Four years later, in Montgomery v.
In an opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch , the justices unanimously ruled that the National Collegiate Athletic Association cannot prohibit its member schools from providing athletes with certain forms of education-related benefits, such as paid post-graduate internships, scholarships for graduate school, or free laptops or musical instruments.
Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents , the Supreme Courtruled that a private individual could sue an FBI agent for violating his Fourth Amendment rights, even when there was not a specific law authorizing a claim for damages. The district courtruled that Boule’s claims would impermissibly extend Bivens , but the U.S.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content