Remove Alabama Remove Immigration Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Government power, from federal agencies to counties, highlights January session

SCOTUSBlog

8 for a packed session of oral arguments – starting with immigration policy and the post-9/11 “No Fly List” and ending on Jan. The statute includes a list of information the government must include – most notably, the time and place of the removal hearing. Share The justices returned to the bench on Jan. Garland and Garland v. .

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules states lack constitutional standing in key immigration case

JURIST

Texas that Texas and Louisiana do not have constitutional standing to sue the federal government over a 2021 Homeland Security Memorandum that focuses immigration enforcement actions on non-citizens who are suspected of terrorism, committed serious crimes or are caught at the border entering illegally.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Acquitted-conduct sentencing returns

SCOTUSBlog

The statute was amended in 1950 to remove burglary from the list, and in 1968 it was amended to add rape and murder, in part because a federal civil rights commission noted the omission of such serious felonies from the list. Alabama , she contends that it was error not to receive the newly proffered mitigating evidence.

article thumbnail

The last grants of October Term 2022?

SCOTUSBlog

Legal Services Alabama, Inc. , 1252(a)(2)(D) bars review of an asserted question of law where a noncitizen has challenged the Board of Immigration Appeals’ interpretation of the statutory extreme hardship standard found at 8 U.S.C. CVSG: 5/18/2023 (relisted after the June 22 conference) Davis v.

article thumbnail

Free exercise, greenhouse-gas regulation, and a slew of other relists from the long conference

SCOTUSBlog

City and County of San Francisco, California , involving an attempt by 14 states to intervene to defend the Trump administration’s controversial “public charge” immigration rule after the Biden administration declined to defend it in court. relisted after the Sept. 27 conference). Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas , 20-493. Epic Systems Corp v.

article thumbnail

Our Crisis of Faith on Constitution Day

JonathanTurley

Whether it is the circumvention of Congress or launching unilateral wars, presidents dance to their own tune to the gleeful applause of their supporters. Take the series of losses recently by the Biden Administration in areas like immigration. In its 5-4 decision in Alabama Association of Realtors v.

Court 52
article thumbnail

August 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Ninth Circuit Affirmed Rejection of NEPA Challenges to Immigration Policies. The plaintiffs—identified as environmentalists, environmental groups, natural resource conservation groups, and cattle ranchers—alleged, among other things, that the immigration actions resulted in increased greenhouse gas emissions. In Juliana v.

Court 40