Remove Alaska Remove Constitutional Law Remove Court
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Clarifies Standing Requirements for Habeas Claim

Constitutional Law Reporter

In Alaska v. Supreme Court held that if offenders have finished serving their state court sentence, they lack standing to bring a federal habeas claim. In 2009, an Alaska jury convicted Sean Wright of 13 counts of sexual abuse of a minor. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. Supreme Court’s Decision.

Court 59
article thumbnail

Judicial Palindrome: How Sarah Palin was Left with Losing by Jury or by Judge

JonathanTurley

The court’s curious handling of the case backfired. That issue would have to be decided by the Supreme Court however given the prior ruling in New York Times v. Rakoff came up with a curious legal version of a palindrome in the defamation trial of former Alaska governor and vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Federal Judge Rejects Palin Motion For New Trial

JonathanTurley

District Judge Jed Rakoff has issued a stinging rebuke to former Alaska Gov. In its earlier ruling against the Times, the court put the theory of the case succinctly in its leading line: “Gov. They were deliberating that very question and now had the view of the court that the “actual malice” standard was not satisfied in the case.

Court 9
article thumbnail

Amendments by Acclamation: Democrats Move to Simply Declare the Equal Rights Amendment as Ratified

JonathanTurley

However, these Democrats insist that a unilateral decision from Ferriero declaring it ratified would mean it is ratified … at least until some courts say otherwise. Democratic members and advocacy groups have pushed to pack the Supreme Court with an instant liberal majority. In 1981, a federal district court ruled in Idaho v.

Laws 58
article thumbnail

Supreme Court to hear “nondelegation” challenge to telecom access program

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Wednesday in a major challenge to the federal E-rate program, which subsidizes telephone and high-speed internet services in schools, libraries, rural areas, and low-income communities in urban areas. Courts of Appeals for the 5th, 6th, 11th, and District of Columbia Circuits.

Court 143
article thumbnail

The lives they lived and the court they shaped: Remembering those we lost in 2022

SCOTUSBlog

Share At the end of each year, SCOTUSblog remembers some of the people whose lives and work left an imprint on the Supreme Court. From legendary lawyers to lesser-known activists, journalists, and plaintiffs, the following individuals who died in 2022 all shaped the court and the law in their own ways. David Beckwith (Oct.

Court 100
article thumbnail

Palin and Public Figures: Is it Time to Reconsider New York Times v. Sullivan and the Actual Malice Standard?

JonathanTurley

Most recently, after numerous efforts to dismiss the case, The New York Times found itself in court defending an editorial that bizarrely appeared to blame former Alaska Gov. Rakoff might, however, have just created the ideal case for the Supreme Court to change that standard on appeal. Devin Nunes, R-Calif.

Tort 45