Remove Alaska Remove Court Rules Remove Tort
article thumbnail

February 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

After Denying Motions to Stop Construction Activities in National Petroleum Reserve, Alaska Federal Court Enjoined Certain Work for Two Weeks. The court also concluded that the plaintiffs had established a likelihood of irreparable harm. Alaska Feb. Alaska Jan. Sovereign IƱupiat for a Living Arctic v.

article thumbnail

February 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The proposed intervenors had argued that ā€œ[t]he public deserves to see documentation of the effort by a tort lawyer to help his tort campaign against by enlisting the New York Office of Attorney General, successfully, if in pursuit of terribly unsuccessful prosecution at a cost, clearly, of millions of taxpayer dollars.ā€

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Palin v. NYT: New Evidence Suggests the New York Times Ignored Internal Objections to Palin Editorial

JonathanTurley

We have previously discussed the lawsuit of former Alaska Gov. The Supreme Court ruled that tort law could not be used to overcome First Amendment protections for free speech or the free press.

Tort 36
article thumbnail

November 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

In addition, the court found that the company had failed to show that the alleged RICO violations proximately caused injury to its business or property. The court also dismissed defamation and related state tort claims. On October 4 , the federal district court for the Northern District of California vacated the U.S.

Court 40
article thumbnail

June 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The court denied, however, Connecticutā€™s motion for costs and fees, noting that several issues raised by Exxon were novel in the Second Circuit and that many relevant portions of district court rulings in other circuits had not been subject to appellate review until the Supreme Courtā€™s recent decision in the Baltimore case.

Court 43