Alaska Statute Technology Assisted Review 
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 11, 2020
The Washington Court of Appeals affirmed a guilty verdict against a climate activist who cut a chain to enter a pipeline facility and attempted to cut a bolt that secured a shutoff valve on the pipeline, which carried tar sands oil from Canada. Lawsuit Challenged Development Plan for Portion of National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MARCH 6, 2018
Alaska Oil & Gas Association v. The Climate Disobedience Action Fund reported that the North Dakota court sentenced an activist who disabled the TransCanada Keystone 1 tar sands pipeline in North Dakota to three years in prison, with two years deferred. Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. Alaska, filed Feb.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JANUARY 13, 2021
Ninth Circuit Said NEPA Review for Offshore Drilling Project Should Have Considered Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Foreign Oil Consumption. 1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. Alaska, filed Dec. Second Lawsuit Filed Challenging “Massive” Oil and Gas Development Project in Alaska. Perdue , No.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
NOVEMBER 7, 2017
The court also granted motions to strike the state law claims pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute. Youth Plaintiffs Commenced Lawsuit Alleging That Alaska’s Climate and Energy Policy Violated Constitutional Rights. Alaska , No. 3AN-17-__ (Alaska Super.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
58 
Let's personalize your content