LawSites

MARCH 9, 2023

At that time, I was in my tenth year as LegalZoom’s GC, dealing with the brunt of several attorney and state bar challenges. LegalZoom received an ABS license in the UK, and eventually in Arizona as well! Prior to this role, he was a principal on LegalZoom’s Attorney Services team.

Laws 76

Laws Legal Services Legal Technology Solution Technology 76

LawSites

DECEMBER 7, 2023

Clearbox builds solutions to simplify the US immigration process for DIY applicants. In its first year, Rasa served over 10,000 people with criminal records across the state of Utah and will be expanding to Arizona. Rasa Legal provides simple and affordable criminal record expungement services and has raised $2.1M

Legal Technology Solution 123

Legal Technology Solution Divorce Technology Legal 123

LegalTalkNetwork

AUGUST 22, 2016

In addition, we recorded interviews about immigration, U.S. Professor James Hodge: Professor of Public Health Law and Ethics and Director of the Public Health Law and Policy Program at Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University. The Global Immigration Crisis. tech GCs, and election laws. Zika Virus.

Immigration 40

Immigration Legal Legal Laws 40

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

Dozens of other defense attorneys had similar reactions. It significantly helped our district attorney to realize the indicators of guilt in the phone calls,” Gibbons wrote, “as well as suggestions on how to introduce the 911 calls to the jury during trial.” But Gibbons told someone. It’s my life’s work,” he told me.

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 14, 2021

Garland is an immigration case. An immigration judge rejected Abdulla’s arguments, and the Board of Immigration Appeals rejected his appeal as untimely because it had been filed beyond the 30-day appeal deadline and had failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances warranting certification of the appeal out of time.

Immigration 93

Immigration Punitive Damages Court Compensatory Damages 93

Law 360

SEPTEMBER 14, 2021

Arizona's attorney general launched the first challenge by a state to the Biden administration's recent mandates requiring millions of workers to be vaccinated against the coronavirus, claiming in a federal court suit filed Tuesday that the policy is unconstitutional because it unfairly favors undocumented immigrants, who are not required to get vaccinated. (..)

Immigration 52

Immigration Attorney Court 52

LegalReader

APRIL 21, 2021

Attorney General Mark Brnovich made the dubious claim that Arizona's natural landscapes will suffer without a better border wall.

Attorney 104

Attorney Immigration Litigating Litigation 104

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 6, 2018

DHS had waived the requirements of NEPA, the Endangered Species Act, the Coastal Zone Management Act, and other laws pursuant to Section 102 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. Arizona Court Ordered Production of Climate Scientists’ Emails Under Arizona’s Public Records Law.

Court 40

Court Government Laws Litigation 40

JURIST

MARCH 10, 2021

The Attorneys General of Arizona and Montana filed an amended a joint lawsuit Monday alleging that the Biden administration has violated immigration and administrative law. The Attorney General of Florida filed a similar lawsuit on Tuesday. Some of those arguments are raised again in the Arizona/Montana complaint.

Immigration 178

Immigration Attorney Administrative Law Laws 178

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MAY 7, 2021

Arizona Federal Court Declined to Put Challenge to Trump “Waters of the United States” Rule on Hold. The federal district court for the District of Arizona denied EPA and the U.S. The City sought injunctive relief, civil penalties ($350 for each violation or $500 for each knowing violation), and attorney fees and costs.

Court 40

Court Government Construction Litigating 40

JURIST

JANUARY 6, 2023

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Thursday filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration seeking reinstatement of a Trump-era public charge inadmissability rule. The rule announced today speaks to the Biden Administration’s commitment to restoring faith in our legal immigration system.

Immigration 104

Immigration Legal Legal Attorney 104

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 7, 2022

immigration court. 1225 , states that the DHS secretary “may” return noncitizens to Mexico during their immigration proceedings, but does not require the secretary to do so, such that the Biden administration can change policies. Arizona — confirming that the rule announced in Simmons v. In her cert petition, the U.S.

Laws 131

Laws Immigration Court Legal 131

The Crime Report

MAY 17, 2021

“Often these community meetings are more likely to be the kinds of residents who are owners instead of renters; they are older residents as opposed to young people, and they may not include immigrants or people who are generally marginalized,” she said. The federal government’s role will also be crucial.

Government 144

Government Laws Diligence Calendaring 144

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to set immigration policy. Texas and Louisiana are challenging a federal policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation, arguing that it violates federal law.

Immigration 104

Immigration Government Healthcare Court 104

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 21, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will again weigh the executive branch’s authority to set immigration policy as some red states claim that the Biden administration’s enforcement decisions are too lax. In a separate case, Arizona, Montana, and Ohio also challenged the policy in a federal district court in Ohio.

Immigration 145

Immigration Court Government Court Rules 145

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 15, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out an effort by Arizona and 12 other states with Republican attorneys general to defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. The case, Arizona v.

Immigration 98

Immigration Government Administrative Law Court 98

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Ninth Circuit Affirmed Rejection of NEPA Challenges to Immigration Policies. The plaintiffs—identified as environmentalists, environmental groups, natural resource conservation groups, and cattle ranchers—alleged, among other things, that the immigration actions resulted in increased greenhouse gas emissions. Shell Oil Co. ,

Court 40

Court Litigating Litigation Government 40

JURIST

MAY 21, 2022

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) attempted to end the policy on April 1 this year, but a group of Republican attorneys general sued the CDC to maintain the order. The policy does not include any special protections for migrants that are seeking asylum, which has drawn criticism from many human rights organizations.

Immigration 222

Immigration Attorney Legal Legal 222

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 27, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked a federal judge’s ruling that had ordered the government to end a Trump-era border policy that allows immigration officials to quickly turn away migrants seeking asylum. At that point, the states with Republican attorneys general tried to intervene in the D.C. After the U.S.

Immigration 103

Immigration Government Court Attorney 103

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Innovation Law Lab , a challenge to the Trump administration’s “remain in Mexico” policy, which allows the Department of Homeland Security to return immigrants seeking asylum to Mexico while they wait for an asylum hearing in U.S. immigration courts. Democratic National Committee and Arizona Republican Party v. California (Feb.

Calendaring 139

Calendaring Immigration Misdemeanor Construction 139

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 22, 2022

Share On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a dispute over whether a group of states, led by Arizona, can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. The oral argument in Arizona v. immigration court.

Immigration 100

Immigration Legal Legal Government 100

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 11, 2024

That includes prosecutors like New York Attorney General Letitia James and politicians like Illinois Gov. In New York, she was joined by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg in this ill-conceived effort. It was Obama who successfully swatted down state efforts to pursue their own policies and programs on immigration enforcement.

Immigration 78

Immigration Legal Legal Attorney 78

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v.

Immigration 97

Immigration Court Administrative Law Government 97

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 23, 2022

Two lower courts had rejected the legislators’ request, reasoning that the state’s Democratic attorney general and the board of elections were already defending the law, but the justices reversed those rulings. And in Arizona v. Justice Sonia Sotomayor was the lone dissenter. She described Thursday’s ruling as “wrong for two reasons.”

Laws 140

Laws Court Attorney Litigation 140