Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 25, 2024

Arizona: The Sixth Amendment case centers on whether the Confrontation Clause allows the prosecution in a criminal trial to present testimony by a substitute expert conveying the testimonial statements of a non-testifying forensic analyst. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. Please check back for updates.

Immigration 52

Immigration Government Court Manufacturing 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 27, 2023

” The First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits, as well as Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, California, Hawaii, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Washington, and Washington D.C., Oral arguments will be held on April 19, 2023.

Court 52

Court Constitutional Law Attorney Laws 52

JonathanTurley

MAY 25, 2021

Courts in Arizona , Kansas and Texas have also ruled against these laws. Thus, Arkansas seeks not only to avoid contracting with companies that refuse to do business with Israel. It also seeks to avoid contracting with anyone who supports or promotes such activity. There are good-faith objections to the BDS movement.

Court Rules 52

Court Rules Contract Laws Court 52

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 14, 2021

Ask any constitutional law student to name the most iconic Supreme Court decision, and they’ll probably answer Marbury v. Arizona ), voting rights ( Baker v. But enough with March Madness melodrama. This is the final round of the Big Dance, and it’s time to vote. Here’s the championship match-up. Board of Education.

Court 107

Court Education Constitutional Law Court Decisions 107

JonathanTurley

MAY 6, 2021

Joseph McConnell was killed while waterskiing after a boat rented in Arizona from an Air Force recreation center surged out of control because of a mechanical failure and hit him. For example, Lt. In the area of medical malpractice, the study found practices and conduct that would be considered primeval in modern torts cases.

Court 52

Court Tort Litigation Litigating 52

JonathanTurley

MARCH 28, 2024

While I agree with the Fifth Circuit that it is largely locked into the existing precedent in cases like Arizona v. 387, 399 (2012), finding “field preemption” of state immigration laws. It is a bitter recognition for the state that the open border conditions are the product of federal laws and policies.

Immigration 76

Immigration Government Laws Court 76

LawTechnologyToday

FEBRUARY 28, 2023

Alfonso Nevárez (AN) of Nevarez Law Group is a skilled injury lawyer that has litigated cases involving catastrophic injuries and death against some of the largest corporations in the world In 1998, Lance Entrekin (LE) started The Entrekin Law Firm to assist injury victims in the state of Arizona.

Law School 98

Law School Laws Personal Injury Education 98

Above The Law

DECEMBER 28, 2022

. * More law schools are kicking USNWR rankings to the curb. We're now at 10 percent of law schools that say they will not participate in the ranking process. 2022 was the year that Constitutional Law dramatically shifted (to the right). [ 2022 was the year that Constitutional Law dramatically shifted (to the right). [

Law School 105

Law School Finance Constitutional Law Court Decisions 105

JonathanTurley

MARCH 2, 2022

We have previously discussed the trial, which began with the introduction of evidence that the New York Times editorial board ignored internal objections to publishing the 2017 column linking Palin to the 2011 shooting in Tucson, Arizona in which then-U.S. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz was seriously injured.

Court 9

Court Constitutional Law Tort Laws 9

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 17, 2022

We have previously discussed the trial, which began with the introduction of evidence that the New York Times editorial board ignored internal objections to publishing the 2017 column linking Palin to the 2011 shooting in Tucson, Arizona in which then-U.S. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz was seriously injured.

Litigating 57

Litigating Litigation Court Lawyers 57

JURIST

MAY 27, 2024

US law student and undergraduate delegates passed four proposed amendments Sunday at the first-ever Model Constitutional Convention hosted by Arizona State University (ASU) Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. This followed two days of discussion and deliberation in Phoenix, Arizona.

Government 197

Government Laws Court Construction 197

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 28, 2021

They are being joined by an unprecedented alliance of academics, writers and activists calling for everything from censorship to incarceration to blacklists. ” Companies like YouTube are now acting as effective state medias in managing a massive system of censorship and speech controls.

Government 51

Government Laws Constitutional Law 51

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 19, 2023

In Arizona et al. Arizona and 18 other States moved to intervene to challenge the district court’s ruling, arguing that the federal government would not defend the Title 42 orders as vigorously as they might. The post SCOTUS Leaves Title 42 in Place Temporarily appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter.

Court Decisions 59

Court Decisions Court Constitutional Law Government 59

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 28, 2022

Thus, “Journalists need to be overt and candid advocates for social justice, and it’s hard to do that under the constraints of objectivity.”.

Laws 59

Laws Constitutional Law Legal Legal 59

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 9, 2021

Almost a dozen states (including Idaho, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Arizona, and North Dakota) have passed legislation to bar CRT and roughly a dozen more are considering such legislation. A coalition of educators and public interest groups has sued states like Oklahoma over such laws.

Education 56

Education Attorney Laws Litigating 56

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 29, 2023

So here is the list to see if you are residing in an anti-free speech state: Arizona Colorado Connecticut Delaware Hawaii Illinois Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Nevada New Jersey New Mexico, New York Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Vermont Washington Wisconsin District of Columbia Here is the brief: Missouri v.

Government 87

Government Attorney Court Constitutional Law 87

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 3, 2021

The law is notably neutral on content. In that case, the court ruled unanimously that an Arizona ordinance was unconstitutional. That is a key distinction given prior Supreme Court rulings like Reed v Town of Gilbert. Under the ordinance, “ideological signs” and “political signs” were subject to different limitations.

Court Rules 48

Court Rules Laws Court Government 48

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 12, 2023

Office of the Governor Various new sites are now reporting that Arizona Gov. 13, 2020, Hobbs emailed Twitter — using her official Arizona secretary of state email — asking the support team to take action against her online trolls. Fox News reported : On Nov. It is also an example of what I have called “ censorship by surrogate.”

Constitutional Law 59

Constitutional Law Laws 59

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 8, 2021

Supreme Court will hear two significant voting rights cases out of Arizona. The cases, Arizona Republican Party v. ” The State of Arizona grants all citizens an equal opportunity to vote in person or by mail. However, it also has voting laws in place that govern those voting processes. In Arizona Republican Party v.

Constitutional Law 98

Constitutional Law Court Laws Government 98

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 27, 2023

The video discussed the effort by Arizona State University students to ban Rittenhouse from campus. The site reportedly declared that opposing the Democratic plan for loan forgiveness is “hate speech.” TikTok labeled as hate speech a video supporting Kyle Rittenhouse, acquitted of killing protesters in Kenosha, Wis.,

Government 59

Government Laws Court Constitutional Law 59

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 26, 2021

They are being joined by an unprecedented alliance of academics, writers and activists calling for everything from censorship to incarceration to blacklists.

Sports 57

Sports Laws Legal Legal 57

JonathanTurley

APRIL 29, 2022

Harvard law professor Jack Goldsmith and University of Arizona law professor Andrew Keane Woods have called for Chinese-style censorship of the internet, stating in The Atlantic that “in the great debate of the past two decades about freedom versus control of the network, China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong.”

Government 11

Government Manufacturing Laws Constitutional Law 11

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 23, 2022

There is an important ruling out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit this week where a divided panel held that Kelli Ward, the Chair of the Arizona Republican Party and former senatorial candidate, cannot withhold her cell phone records from the January 6th Committee. That is quite sweeping.

Court 44

Court Litigation Litigating Constitutional Law 44

JonathanTurley

JULY 4, 2022

This week, Arizona Democrats pushed a “ F–k the Fourth Event” and told people to “Bring comfortable shoes, water, lawn chairs, posters, and your anger.” Below is my column in the Hill on overheated rhetoric of revolution that seems to have overtaken our public discourse, particularly with regard to the Supreme Court.

Court Rules 57

Court Rules Court Laws Court Decisions 57

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 10, 2024

However, the federal government is not required to spend money on services where costs are rising at least in part because of resistance to federal law. Under constitutional law, the federal government cannot be a bully, but it does not have to be a chump. United States.

Immigration 77

Immigration Government Felony Healthcare 77

JonathanTurley

MAY 5, 2021

Indeed, the Atlantic published an article by Harvard Law School professor Jack Goldsmith and University of Arizona law professor Andrew Keane Woods calling for Chinese style censorship of the internet.

Government 59

Government Law School Laws Constitutional Law 59

LLRX

NOVEMBER 16, 2022

Stefanie Lindquist Foundation Professor of Law and Political Science, Arizona State University, answers critical questions including: does an indictment – or even a felony conviction – prevent a presidential candidate from running or serving in office?

Felony 83

Felony Legal Legal Laws 83

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 5, 2024

The seeds of this disaster were planted by the Supreme Court over a decade ago, in Arizona v. In that case, a 5-3 majority ruled against a state seeking to enforce immigration laws in light of what it described as a vacuum of federal action. There is a difference between the colloquial and constitutional meaning of such terms.

Immigration 82

Immigration Court Government Laws 82

JonathanTurley

MAY 10, 2022

The latest such ruling comes from the Arizona Supreme Court which ruled that Democrats could not prevent Rep. Yet, scholars like Harvard Professor Laurence Tribe have endorsed this sweeping interpretation. It has been rejected repeatedly in the courts. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) from appearing on the ballot in 2022. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R.,

Drafting 41

Drafting Court Legal Legal 41

JonathanTurley

JUNE 24, 2022

Hearing an account of Trump lawyer John Eastman tell the Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers to “just do it” in scrapping the state’s slate of electors was cringeworthy. However, many seem to be making the same demand of Attorney General Garland about bringing criminal charges.

Attorney 51

Attorney Legal Legal Lawyers 51

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

The Supreme Court called the appellate court’s conclusion that there are always reasonable legal alternatives to disobeying constitutional laws “untenable,” and held that “reasonable legal alternatives” must be effective. BP p.l.c. , Two amicus briefs were filed in support of the companies, one by the U.S. United States.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 27, 2020

The Atlantic published an article by Harvard Law School professor Jack Goldsmith and University of Arizona law professor Andrew Keane Woods calling for Chinese style censorship of the internet. These efforts are drawing upon the work of academics who are pushing for greater censorship and speech controls.

Laws 57

Laws Tort Law School Constitutional Law 57

JonathanTurley

JULY 5, 2021

Democratic National Committee , an Arizona case in which the U.S. The Biden administration has made opposition to Georgia’s law into a rallying cry for its stalled legislative efforts to federalize state election laws. The lawsuit was less surprising than its timing: It was filed just days before the release of Brnovich v.

Litigation 55

Litigation Litigating Legal Legal 55

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 20, 2022

That 6-3 decision upheld Arizona’s ban on ballot harvesting or collection and its ban on out-of-precinct voting. For those opposing the federalization of election laws, there is a good-faith basis for opposing such legislation (even if you would not support such bans in your own state). Democratic National Committee.

Court 55

Court Laws Litigating Litigation 55

JonathanTurley

JULY 9, 2022

Whether such state enforcement is constitutional will be hashed out in the courts in light of the 2012 decision in Arizona v. On immigration, however, it became more difficult just ten years ago with the Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona v. The Biden Administration has already indicated that it will oppose such efforts.

Immigration 43

Immigration Government Court Laws 43

JonathanTurley

APRIL 23, 2022

There are similar efforts to block members like Arizona GOP Reps. Totenberg gave a green light to these constitutional claims despite both the constitutional text and history showing that the claims are meritless. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Richmond, Va. Paul Gosar and Andy Biggs from appearing on state ballots.

Court 59

Court Constitutional Law Government Laws 59

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 11, 2023

It is the “why not” approach to criminal and constitutional law. This week, Democratic Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes aptly described the claimed right to disqualify as a “radical” measure that would “encompass every elected office in our government — state, local, federal, and so forth.”

Constitutional Law 86

Constitutional Law Lawyers Lawyer Law School 86