SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 27, 2022

Arizona does not provide a basis for civil damages under 42 U.S.C. The majority’s decision both hobbles Miranda ’s enforceability and unceremoniously strips the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination of Miranda ’s prophylactic protection, heretofore regarded as criminal procedure canon in American law.

Court 101

Court Constitutional Law Government Statute 101

JonathanTurley

MARCH 28, 2024

Many of us had predicted this result given the prior precedent of the Supreme Court on the federal preemption of state immigration laws. ” I also previously discussed how this interpretation would fail due to the text, intent, and history of the underlying constitutional provision. United States , 567 U.S.

Immigration 51

Immigration Government Laws Court 51

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 25, 2024

1770 (2022), the Supreme Court held that that the provision contravened Congress’s constitutional authority to “establish…uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies,” U.S. The post SCOTUS Kicks Off January 2024 Session With Five Cases appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. In Siegel v.

Immigration 52

Immigration Government Court Manufacturing 52

LawTechnologyToday

FEBRUARY 28, 2023

Alfonso Nevárez (AN) of Nevarez Law Group is a skilled injury lawyer that has litigated cases involving catastrophic injuries and death against some of the largest corporations in the world In 1998, Lance Entrekin (LE) started The Entrekin Law Firm to assist injury victims in the state of Arizona. Law school is theoretical.

Law School 98

Law School Laws Personal Injury Education 98

JonathanTurley

MAY 25, 2021

We have been discussing the state laws requiring contractors and employees to swear that they do not support the the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (“BDS”) movement against Israel. I have long maintained that the law is unconstitutional as a limitation of free speech and associational rights. 50-5-85(b). ” O.C.G.A.

Court Rules 37

Court Rules Contract Laws Court 37

JonathanTurley

MAY 6, 2021

Joseph McConnell was killed while waterskiing after a boat rented in Arizona from an Air Force recreation center surged out of control because of a mechanical failure and hit him. Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. For example, Lt.

Court 37

Court Tort Litigation Litigating 37

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 19, 2023

In Arizona et al. Arizona and 18 other States moved to intervene to challenge the district court’s ruling, arguing that the federal government would not defend the Title 42 orders as vigorously as they might. The post SCOTUS Leaves Title 42 in Place Temporarily appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter.

Court Decisions 59

Court Decisions Court Constitutional Law Government 59

Above The Law

DECEMBER 28, 2022

The majority of the Supreme Court is once again shifting their interpretation of the law in order to support right-wing political objectives! More law schools are kicking USNWR rankings to the curb. We're now at 10 percent of law schools that say they will not participate in the ranking process. ABA Journal ].

Law School 81

Law School Finance Constitutional Law Court Decisions 81

JURIST

MAY 27, 2024

JP Leskovich is a rising 3L at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and JURIST’s News Managing Editor. This is the third in a series of dispatches he’s filed as an embedded reporter for JURIST at the Model Constitutional Convention sponsored by the Center for Constitutional Design at ASU Law.

Government 197

Government Laws Court Construction 197

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 17, 2022

We have previously discussed the trial, which began with the introduction of evidence that the New York Times editorial board ignored internal objections to publishing the 2017 column linking Palin to the 2011 shooting in Tucson, Arizona in which then-U.S. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz was seriously injured.

Litigation 42

Litigation Litigating Court Lawyer 42

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 28, 2021

Wojcicki explained that “[w]hen we work with governments, there are many things that we have to take in consideration, whether it’s local laws or what’s happening on the ground.” Nevertheless, CEO Susan Wojcicki bizarrely claimed in a Bloomberg interview Bloomberg Television that free speech remains a “core value” for the company.

Government 37

Government Laws Constitutional Law 37

JonathanTurley

MARCH 2, 2022

We have previously discussed the trial, which began with the introduction of evidence that the New York Times editorial board ignored internal objections to publishing the 2017 column linking Palin to the 2011 shooting in Tucson, Arizona in which then-U.S. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz was seriously injured.

Court 7

Court Constitutional Law Laws Tort 7

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 9, 2021

The exchange occurred as Taub was being questioned on the meaning of “sectarian” under the law. Almost a dozen states (including Idaho, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Arizona, and North Dakota) have passed legislation to bar CRT and roughly a dozen more are considering such legislation.

Education 40

Education Attorney Laws Litigation 40

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 29, 2023

So here is the list to see if you are residing in an anti-free speech state: Arizona Colorado Connecticut Delaware Hawaii Illinois Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Nevada New Jersey New Mexico, New York Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Vermont Washington Wisconsin District of Columbia Here is the brief: Missouri v.

Government 84

Government Attorney Court Constitutional Law 84

JonathanTurley

JULY 4, 2022

This week, Arizona Democrats pushed a “ F–k the Fourth Event” and told people to “Bring comfortable shoes, water, lawn chairs, posters, and your anger.” Madison in 1803, when the court ruled that it must be the final arbiter of what the law means. Americans believe in the rule of law; it is in our political DNA.

Court Rules 42

Court Rules Court Laws Court Decisions 42

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 12, 2023

Office of the Governor Various new sites are now reporting that Arizona Gov. 13, 2020, Hobbs emailed Twitter — using her official Arizona secretary of state email — asking the support team to take action against her online trolls. Fox News reported : On Nov. It is also an example of what I have called “ censorship by surrogate.”

Constitutional Law 53

Constitutional Law Laws 53

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. and non-U.S. climate litigation charts. If you know of any cases we have missed, please email us at columbiaclimate@gmail.com.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 8, 2021

Supreme Court will hear two significant voting rights cases out of Arizona. The cases, Arizona Republican Party v. ” The State of Arizona grants all citizens an equal opportunity to vote in person or by mail. However, it also has voting laws in place that govern those voting processes. In Arizona Republican Party v.

Constitutional Law 98

Constitutional Law Court Laws Government 98

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 28, 2022

The panic over free speech breaking out on a single social media site is shared by journalism and law professors. These companies are only able to sell censorship because they have largely been able to bar free speech competitors. Now there may be an alternative. Twitter is to be taken over by the evil Sith lord.”

Laws 54

Laws Constitutional Law Legal Legal 54

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 27, 2023

Ohio, a 1969 case involving “violent speech,” the court struck down an Ohio law prohibiting public speech that was deemed as promoting illegal conduct. granted a preliminary injunction on the basis that “the Hateful Conduct Law” is blatantly unconstitutional, which it most certainly is. Law § 394-ccc(1)(a)]. Likewise, in RAV v.

Government 48

Government Laws Court Constitutional Law 48

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 3, 2021

The law is notably neutral on content. In that case, the court ruled unanimously that an Arizona ordinance was unconstitutional. The content-based regulation triggered “strict scrutiny” analysis requiring that the government must demonstrate that the law has been “narrowly tailored” to serve a “compelling interest.”.

Court Rules 35

Court Rules Laws Court Government 35

LLRX

NOVEMBER 16, 2022

Stefanie Lindquist Foundation Professor of Law and Political Science, Arizona State University, answers critical questions including: does an indictment – or even a felony conviction – prevent a presidential candidate from running or serving in office?

Felony 86

Felony Legal Legal Laws 86

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 23, 2022

There is an important ruling out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit this week where a divided panel held that Kelli Ward, the Chair of the Arizona Republican Party and former senatorial candidate, cannot withhold her cell phone records from the January 6th Committee. That is quite sweeping.

Court 32

Court Litigation Litigating Constitutional Law 32

JonathanTurley

JULY 9, 2022

Greg Abbott signed an order allowing Texas law enforcement to return illegal immigrants apprehended in the state back to the U.S. Whether such state enforcement is constitutional will be hashed out in the courts in light of the 2012 decision in Arizona v. United States. Indeed, in this month’s ruling in Biden v.

Immigration 34

Immigration Government Court Laws 34

JonathanTurley

MAY 5, 2021

In what could be called Zuckerberg’s “He Who Must Not Be Heard” standard, Facebook blocked an interview of Trump with his daughter-in-law Lara Trump. Thus, if Trump whispered his answers to his daughter-in-law, she could say the words. The company declared that it would censor any content “in the voice of Donald Trump.”

Government 50

Government Law School Laws Constitutional Law 50

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 5, 2024

The courts have left few options for either the states or Congress in compelling the enforcement of federal law. The seeds of this disaster were planted by the Supreme Court over a decade ago, in Arizona v. There is a difference between the colloquial and constitutional meaning of such terms. if not earlier.

Immigration 59

Immigration Court Government Laws 59

JonathanTurley

MAY 10, 2022

The latest such ruling comes from the Arizona Supreme Court which ruled that Democrats could not prevent Rep. as prescribed by law,” and does not include the Disqualification Clause, a legal proscription from holding office. . Yet, scholars like Harvard Professor Laurence Tribe have endorsed this sweeping interpretation.

Drafting 38

Drafting Court Legal Legal 38

JonathanTurley

JUNE 24, 2022

On CNN’s “Erin Burnett OutFront, ” Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe declared that Trump can now be charged with the attempted murder of former Vice President Mike Pence “without any doubt, beyond a reasonable doubt, beyond any doubt, and the crimes are obvious.” He has been criticized for treating the law as endlessly malleable.

Attorney 36

Attorney Legal Legal Lawyer 36

JonathanTurley

APRIL 29, 2022

For her part, Hillary Clinton is looking to Europe to fill the vacuum and called upon her European counterparts to pass a massive censorship law to “bolster global democracy before it’s too late.” Former President Obama has declared “regulation has to be part of the answer” to disinformation.

Government 11

Government Manufacturing Laws Constitutional Law 11

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 26, 2021

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. They are being joined by an unprecedented alliance of academics, writers and activists calling for everything from censorship to incarceration to blacklists. You can find his updates online @JonathanTurley.

Sports 41

Sports Laws Legal Legal 41

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 27, 2020

Now, Harvard Law Professor and Bloomberg columnist has added a Trump-like call for the use of defamation lawsuit to combat “fake news.” Sullivan, sued for defamation and won under Alabama law. The Supreme Court ruled that tort law could not be used to overcome First Amendment protections for free speech or the free press.

Laws 41

Laws Tort Law School Court 41

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 28, 2021

In this case, even Democratic senators like Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Joe Manchin of West Virginia have objected to the hike. It is the type of action that legislative process is designed address through deliberation and compromise. The filibuster forces such compromise. In the past, Democrats have recognized the value of that process.

Constitutional Law 56

Constitutional Law Laws 56

JonathanTurley

JULY 5, 2021

DA Steele is unapologetic and insists he was trying to show that “no one is above the law — including those who are rich, famous and powerful.” Democratic National Committee , an Arizona case in which the U.S. Likewise, Biden falsely claimed Georgia’s law prevents voters in line at polling places from getting water.

Litigation 39

Litigation Litigating Legal Legal 39

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 20, 2022

It did not make discrimination lawful or, in any way, limit access to the courts. However, laws can still be challenged before elections as discriminatory. That 6-3 decision upheld Arizona’s ban on ballot harvesting or collection and its ban on out-of-precinct voting. Holder , 570 U.S.

Laws 39

Laws Court Litigation Litigating 39

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 3, 2024

justices as being, in the words of law professor Cass Sunstein, “ illegitimate, undemocratic, and unprincipled.” At the time, another rising star in Republican legal circles was getting her start as a young law firm associate. Wade while upholding more stringent state abortion laws. This is one of those cases.

Court 46

Court Constitutional Law Litigation Litigating 46

JonathanTurley

APRIL 23, 2022

There are similar efforts to block members like Arizona GOP Reps. Totenberg gave a green light to these constitutional claims despite both the constitutional text and history showing that the claims are meritless. Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University.

Court 49

Court Constitutional Law Government Laws 49

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 11, 2023

It is the “why not” approach to criminal and constitutional law. While the report expressly claims that the Fulton County District Attorney’s office did not create the list, it was the office of Fani Willis that presented the law, the evidence and potential targets to the special grand jury. and Maurice C.

Constitutional Law 69

Constitutional Law Lawyer Lawyers Law School 69