SCOTUSBlog

JULY 1, 2021

Share On the last day before its summer recess, the Supreme Court issued a major decision on voting rights that will make it more difficult to contest election regulations under the Voting Rights Act. The Democratic National Committee went to federal court in 2016, arguing that both restrictions violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

Court 141

Court Statute Felony Laws 141

JURIST

MARCH 3, 2021

The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in a case that will shape the future of restrictive voting rights laws. The court heard arguments in the combined cases of Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee and Arizona Republican Party v. Democratic National Committee concerning two Arizona state laws.

Court 104

Court Attorney Statute Court Rules 104

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 7, 2021

Share This article is the final entry in a symposium on the court’s decision in Brnovich v. The court upheld Arizona’s ban on vote trafficking (or what is euphemistically referred to as “vote harvesting”) and the state’s requirement that an individual vote within his assigned precinct for his ballot to count.

Court 144

Court Government Laws Statute 144

Paralegal Bootcamp

JULY 28, 2022

In some jurisdictions (like Arizona), the jurors are sent questions to answer. After trial, if your client feels he should appeal the verdict due to some error, the Criminal Law Paralegal can file a Notice of Appeal with your respective appellate court. is to know your local rules and statutes. Conflict Checks. Meet the Author.

Paralegal 264

Paralegal Paralegals Criminal Law Laws 264

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 6, 2021

Share This article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Brnovich v. Arizona “generally makes it quite easy for residents to vote.” Democratic National Committee set the path for the six-justice majority of the Supreme Court to reject challenges to two Arizona laws. Democratic National Committee.

Laws 102

Laws Court Contract Entertainment 102

SCOTUSBlog

SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

Share The Supreme Court on Friday issued orders from its so-called “long conference” – the justices’ private conference in the last week of September, at which they met for the first time since the end of June to add new cases to their docket. The trial court rejected that argument, and the California Court of Appeals agreed.

Calendaring 123

Calendaring Court Statute Court Rules 123

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 17, 2023

Meanwhile, the water level at Lake Powell, the massive reservoir created by the Glen Canyon Dam on the Utah-Arizona border, is at historic lows, threatening its ability to generate power. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. The first issue in Arizona v. California , governing the apportionment of water from the Colorado River.

Government 114

Government Statute Court Litigation 114

JURIST

MARCH 17, 2022

The Northern District Court of California Tuesday ruled that Major League Baseball (MLB) violated Arizona and Florida state minimum wage laws when not paying minor leaguers during spring training, instructional leagues, or extended spring training. Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C.

Statute 104

Statute Laws Attorney Court 104

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 4, 2022

Cochran present a frontal assault on the traditional framework under which federal courts have entertained complaints about federal agencies. The first case involves Axon Enterprise, an Arizona company that makes police body cameras and other technology products for law enforcement. The general federal jurisdiction statute ( 28 U.S.C.

Statute 118

Statute Entertainment Court Administrative Law 118

LawSites

JULY 27, 2022

The chief justice of the California Supreme Court, Tani Gorre Cantil-Sakauye , said that the state legislature is to blame for stalling efforts to bring about regulatory reforms to address the state’s gap in access to justice. Every year, the bar dues bill has to be approved by the California legislature, not the Supreme Court.

Lawyers 98

Lawyers Lawyer Legal Services Attorney 98

Diane Drain

JANUARY 3, 2021

CFPB Sues Encore Capital Group, Midland Funding, Midland Credit Management, and Asset Acceptance Capital Corp for Collecting Debts Beyond Statute of Limitations without disclosing debts were uncollectable, and other illegal acts. Drain - Phoenix Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney. and Asset Acceptance Capital Corp. – Diane L.

Statute 104

Statute Attorney Court 104

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 8, 2024

Singh , in which the court will consider what kind of notice the government must provide before a noncitizen can be deported for not appearing in court. The statute includes a list of information the government must include – most notably, the time and place of the removal hearing. Garland and Garland v. Under 8 U.S.C.

Government 108

Government Statute Court Cause of Action 108

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 3, 2023

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. This week, we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, precisely what funds the Indian Health Service must pay to tribes that manage their own health care. On appeal, the U.S. In Becerra v.

Government 86

Government Contract Statute Construction 86

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 19, 2022

Arizona is one of the most significant Supreme Court decisions in American criminal procedure. Generally, if the police obtain a suspect’s statement in violation of Miranda , the government cannot use that statement against the defendant in court. Tekoh presents the court with that question. Share Miranda v.

Court 102

Court Government Lawyers Lawyer 102

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 2, 2021

Mark Brnovich is the attorney general of Arizona. “… the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”. For this reason, any state statutes containing widespread prohibitions or overly burdensome regulations on the concealed carry of firearms must be immediately questioned. A preview of the case is here.

Statute 104

Statute Attorney Education Government 104

LawSites

DECEMBER 29, 2021

In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them. Do courts fully reopen or not?

Legal 145

Legal Legal Legal Services Technology 145

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 25, 2022

Share On Wednesday, the Supreme Court considered whether a violation of Miranda v. Arizona allows a plaintiff to sue for money damages under 42 U.S.C. Thomas asked if Dickerson held that Miranda cannot be displaced by a federal statute, why is Miranda not a constitutional right, actionable under Section 1983? Stated thusly?

Cause of Action 134

Cause of Action Court Litigating Litigation 134

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 26, 2022

Specifically, the statute calls for differential pay when a reservist is “perform[ing] active duty in the uniformed services pursuant to a call or order to active duty under … a provision of law referred to in [10 U.S.C. §] 101(a)(13)(b).” Customs and Border Protection and as a technical sergeant in the Arizona Air National Guard.

Human Resources 98

Human Resources Court Statute Laws 98

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 27, 2022

Share On Thursday, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Vega v. Tekoh , in which a 6-3 court held that a violation of Miranda v. Arizona does not provide a basis for civil damages under 42 U.S.C. The Supreme Court rejected the 9th Circuit’s decision, characterizing it as an “extension” of Miranda and “wrong.”

Court 100

Court Constitutional Law Statute Government 100

Conflict of Laws

JUNE 28, 2023

Supreme Court yesterday upheld the constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s corporate registration statute, even though it requires out-of-state corporations registering to do business within the state to consent to all-purpose (general) personal jurisdiction. courts over disputes that arise in other countries. Washington (1945).

Court 40

Court Statute Cause of Action Contract 40

Diane Drain

APRIL 3, 2021

That statute made a number of additional temporary changes to the Bankruptcy Code, all of which, by their terms, expire either one year or two years after the changes became effective. If the debtor fails to modify his plan, the bankruptcy court (on its own motion), the U.S. This debt limit was increased to $7.5

Small Business 104

Small Business Statute Contract Attorney 104

Diane Drain

DECEMBER 31, 2020

It is possible that these interpretations of the new Act will change with new legislation or court decisions, so never assume what you read one day will be interpreted the same way the next day. If the debtor fails to modify his plan, the bankruptcy court (on its own motion), the U.S. A brief description of the amendments follows.

Small Business 104

Small Business Contract Statute Government 104

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

APRIL 18, 2023

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a decision in California Restaurant Association v. The court overturned a District Court ruling to invalidate a Berkeley, California, prohibition on natural gas infrastructure in newly-constructed buildings. O n Monday, April 17, 2023, the U.S. City of Berkeley.

Construction 122

Construction Government Legal Legal 122

JonathanTurley

MAY 25, 2021

This week, a court in Georgia became the latest to declare such laws unconstitutional. 1982), the Supreme Court addressed a boycott of white-owned businesses in Mississippi. District Court Judge Mark Cohen ruled for Martin on the core constitutional challenge. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on Feb. In NAACP v.

Court Rules 51

Court Rules Contract Laws Court 51

Broadcast Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 19, 2022

The FCC’s Media Bureau issued an Order granting the license renewal of an FM station is Arizona for only one year, instead of the normal eight year period, because the station had been silent for extended periods.

Statute 59

Statute Legal Legal Court 59

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 25, 2024

Supreme Court returned from recess on January 4, 2024. The Court’s January session will feature some of the Term’s biggest cases, with several testing the limit of the federal government’s regulatory power. Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Federal Bureau of Investigation v. In Siegel v. I, § 8, Cl.

Immigration 52

Immigration Government Court Manufacturing 52

JURIST

MARCH 7, 2025

Maricopa County Superior Court of Arizona ruled Wednesday that Arizona’s abortion ban after 15 weeks of pregnancy was unconstitutional and permanently enjoined Arizona employees from enforcing the abortion ban. And Planned Parenthood Arizona will not stop fighting for our patients and our health care staff.”

Court Rules 129

Court Rules Healthcare Court Statute 129

Diane Drain

APRIL 20, 2021

Arizona Bill wants Judgment Creditor to get paid before homeowners when house is refinanced (something Arizona law has not allowed since mid 1950s). Concerns about Arizona HB 2617, especially with the amendments: will allow old and new judgments to attached to homesteads. Drain - Phoenix Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney.

Statute 232

Statute Laws Attorney Court 232

LawSites

DECEMBER 29, 2021

In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them. Do courts fully reopen or not?

Legal 52

Legal Legal Legal Services Technology 52

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

Federal Court Found Flaws in New Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Second, the court concluded that BLM should have calculated and considered total greenhouse emissions, instead of merely relying on comparisons of yearly emission rates.

Court 59

Court Government Litigation Litigating 59

JURIST

AUGUST 21, 2024

The Arizona Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that a 200-word description of a ballot initiative to enshrine a right to abortion in the state’s constitution was valid and determined voters would see the initiative on the statewide general election ballot.

Court 211

Court Statute Court Rules Laws 211

JURIST

APRIL 9, 2024

Arizona’s Supreme Court found on Tuesday that a 159-year-old law banning abortion is enforceable following the US Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn abortion rights case Roe v Wade, sending a 52-year-old case back to trial court. Given the injunction, and in line with Roe , Arizona’s abortion policy evolved.

Laws 249

Laws Court Statute Criminal Law 249

JURIST

OCTOBER 8, 2022

An Arizona state appeals court Friday blocked enforcement of a 1901 abortion ban, which bans all abortions unless the procedure is necessary to save a pregnant person’s life. Planned Parenthood said, with the stay in place, Arizona clinics will now resume abortion procedures.

Court 223

Court Healthcare Statute Attorney 223

Diane Drain

MAY 15, 2021

On January 1, 2022, HB2617 will become the law of Arizona. Your home is no longer protected from your judgment creditors, which will have a devastating effect on Arizona’s consumers, and those hardest hit by Covid-19. The homestead exemption has been an essential Arizona consumer protection law since the beginning of Arizona statehood.

Laws 197

Laws Litigation Litigating Court 197

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

SEPTEMBER 12, 2024

States such as Ohio, Virginia, Illinois, California, Florida Georgia , Texas, Arizona, and Oregon have emerged as major data center hubs and are now faced with the challenge of upgrading their grids to bring more electricity to them. In this regard, the Supreme Court of Ohio has held that R.C. where data center growth is concentrated.

Manufacturing 72

Manufacturing Finance Statute Court 72

JURIST

JULY 12, 2022

US District Court Judge Douglas Rayes Monday blocked Arizona’s “personhood” law from taking effect. This order only affects the “personhood” law and not the other abortion laws on Arizona’s books.

Laws 232

Laws Statute Attorney Court 232

Diane Drain

JULY 16, 2021

Arizona Residential Eviction Actions Procedures – effective July 15, 2021. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED beginning on the effective date of this Order, all other eviction cases shall be processed solely under Arizona statutes and rules, except as provided herein. PLEADINGS. CALENDARING FOR ALL CASES. – 10:00 A.M.

Calendaring 104

Calendaring Statute Court Cause of Action 104