The Crime Report

NOVEMBER 22, 2021

Across America, law enforcement agencies have been accused of targeting Hispanic drivers, failing to collect data on those traffic stops, and covering up potential officer misconduct and aggressive immigration enforcement by identifying people as white on tickets, reports ProPublica. require the collection of data on traffic stops.

Immigration 128

Immigration Laws 128

JURIST

MARCH 23, 2021

Hassaid to consider a California agricultural union organizing law. ” Under California law, agricultural businesses must allow labor organizations onto their property up to three times a day over a 30-day period, up to 120 days per year. The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in Cedar Point Nursery v.

Laws 118

Laws Court Legal Assistant Legal Assistance 118

The Crime Report

MARCH 8, 2022

A law enforcement arm of the Department of Homeland Security is participating in a secret bulk surveillance program that collected millions of records about certain money transfers of some Americans without a warrant, according to U.S. Ron Wyden (D-OR), reports the Wall Street Journal.

Immigration 74

Immigration Attorney Laws 74

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 20, 2024

This week, we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether Arizona’s sentencing law for juvenile offenders convicted of first-degree murder violates Miller because, although the law allows for the possibility of release, the state abolished parole for homicide in 1994. In Bassett v.

Misdemeanor 82

Misdemeanor Punitive Damages Felony Court 82

LawSites

MARCH 9, 2023

As discussed in yesterday’s part one , this post is the second in a three-part series of reflections on the ReInvent Law Silicon Valley event, held in Mountain View Calif., on March 8, 2013, and what it meant to the authors and to the broader movement for innovation in law. Reinvent Law was there when we were all thinking, “Could we?”

Laws 75

Laws Legal Services Legal Technology Solution Technology 75

The Crime Report

JULY 8, 2022

Abbott, in a statement, said the goal was to return “illegal immigrants to the border to stop this criminal enterprise endangering our communities,” but the move could put the state into direct conflict with the federal government over immigration. Meanwhile, some Republican leaders say that the order does not go far enough.

Immigration 52

Immigration Court Rules Government Laws 52

Above The Law

DECEMBER 28, 2022

The majority of the Supreme Court is once again shifting their interpretation of the law in order to support right-wing political objectives! More law schools are kicking USNWR rankings to the curb. We're now at 10 percent of law schools that say they will not participate in the ranking process. ABA Journal ].

Law School 104

Law School Finance Constitutional Law Court Decisions 104

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 2, 2021

Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Supreme Court Rules on Tribal Police and Immigrants’ Testimony (Adam Liptak, The New York Times). No ‘Magic Words’ Needed as Asylum-Seekers Lose at High Court (Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson, Bloomberg Law). Supreme Court will not take up Johnson & Johnson challenge of $2.1

Immigration 64

Immigration Court Rules Court Decisions Court 64

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 8, 2024

8 for a packed session of oral arguments – starting with immigration policy and the post-9/11 “No Fly List” and ending on Jan. That, the justices said, violated the Constitution’s requirement that Congress provide “uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States.” Garland and Garland v. Does the U.S.

Government 96

Government Statute Court Cause of Action 96

Constitutional Law Reporter

MARCH 10, 2022

The issues before the Court involved Native American law and immigration. City and County of San Francisco, California : The case revolves around a legal challenge to a federal immigration rule. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. Supreme Court recently returned to the bench for its February sitting.

Immigration 52

Immigration Drafting Constitutional Law Court 52

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 31, 2023

Here’s the full list of cases scheduled for oral argument in the March 2023 argument session: Arizona v. VIP Products (March 22): Whether and when trademark law prohibits a spoof of a company’s brand. Navajo Nation & Department of Interior v. United States v.

Court 95

Court Calendaring Immigration Legal 95

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 19, 2023

In Arizona et al. Arizona and 18 other States moved to intervene to challenge the district court’s ruling, arguing that the federal government would not defend the Title 42 orders as vigorously as they might. The post SCOTUS Leaves Title 42 in Place Temporarily appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter.

Court Decisions 59

Court Decisions Court Constitutional Law Government 59

LawSites

DECEMBER 7, 2023

Clearbox builds solutions to simplify the US immigration process for DIY applicants. Courtroom5 , a platform that helps self-represented litigants navigate complex civil litigation matters, licensed their tech to NCCU Law for classroom use and is in development on a new platform slated for release in spring 2024.

Legal Technology Solution 122

Legal Technology Solution Divorce Technology Legal 122

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 25, 2024

Garland: The immigration case centers on the Immigration and Nationality Act, which provides that a noncitizen who does not appear at a removal hearing shall be ordered removed in absentia. The post SCOTUS Kicks Off January 2024 Session With Five Cases appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. Campos-Chaves v. In Siegel v.

Immigration 52

Immigration Government Court Manufacturing 52

JURIST

JUNE 24, 2023

Texas that Texas and Louisiana do not have constitutional standing to sue the federal government over a 2021 Homeland Security Memorandum that focuses immigration enforcement actions on non-citizens who are suspected of terrorism, committed serious crimes or are caught at the border entering illegally.

Immigration 211

Immigration Court Rules Court Statute 211

JURIST

MARCH 18, 2024

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito indefinitely extended a stay blocking the enforcement of a Texas law that criminalizes illegal entry into the state from other countries. The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit later stayed that injunction, allowing the law to go into effect.

Immigration 257

Immigration Laws Court Misdemeanor 257

JURIST

DECEMBER 19, 2023

Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed a bill into law Monday that criminalizes illegal entry into the border state from anywhere but a port of entry, exerting state jurisdiction over what is normally a federal matter. An additional bill, Senate Bill 3 , was also signed into law to provide over $1.5

Immigration 129

Immigration Laws Misdemeanor Statute 129

JURIST

DECEMBER 20, 2023

Civil rights groups filed a lawsuit on Tuesday challenging a recently enacted Texas law , which gives state officials broad powers to arrest, prosecute and deport people who illegally cross the US-Mexico border. In the lawsuit, El Paso County claimed the current immigrant non-citizen community pays approximately $591.8

Immigration 129

Immigration Laws Government Court 129

SquirePattonBoggs

APRIL 15, 2022

The Sixth Circuit issued a very interesting decision three days ago in Arizona v. The origins of the dispute go back to last fall when the Secretary of Homeland Security issued “Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law.” Biden (22-3272). The States also had a causation problem.

Immigration 45

Immigration Court Government Laws 45

JonathanTurley

MARCH 28, 2024

Many of us had predicted this result given the prior precedent of the Supreme Court on the federal preemption of state immigration laws. While I agree with the Fifth Circuit that it is largely locked into the existing precedent in cases like Arizona v. ’ The Texas and federal laws are not congruent on this score.

Immigration 65

Immigration Government Laws Court 65

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 17, 2023

Natural Resources Defense Council , in which the court held that when a federal statute is ambiguous, courts should defer to an agency’s interpretation of that law as long as it is reasonable. Arizona (Jan. But at the arguments on Jan. Garland (consolidated with Garland v. Singh , Jan. Fikre (Jan. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC (Jan.

Immigration 114

Immigration Calendaring Government Manufacturing 114

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 5, 2024

The courts have left few options for either the states or Congress in compelling the enforcement of federal law. The seeds of this disaster were planted by the Supreme Court over a decade ago, in Arizona v. Most are promptly released, and many are not even asked to appear for eight years at an immigration proceeding.

Immigration 71

Immigration Court Government Laws 71

LegalTalkNetwork

AUGUST 22, 2016

On day two we opened with employee handbooks and election laws, and closed out with celebrity writers, Supreme Court vacancies, driverless cars, and national security. In addition, we recorded interviews about immigration, U.S. tech GCs, and election laws. Connell Distinguished Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law.

Immigration 40

Immigration Legal Legal Laws 40

JURIST

FEBRUARY 29, 2024

A Texas federal judge issued a preliminary injunction on Thursday suspending enforcement of a Texas state law that criminalized illegal entry to the US from abroad. The law, SB4 , criminalized a number of immigration offenses under state law and empowered state law enforcement to make arrests and hold people in detention.

Immigration 211

Immigration Laws Government Court 211

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

It can be next to impossible to see how law enforcement — in league with paid, self-styled “experts” — spreads new, often unproven methods. At the time, it didn’t sound plausible even as a one-off gambit, let alone something pervasive that law enforcement nationwide had embraced as legitimate. . … Make it sing!”. I was wrong.

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98

The Crime Report

AUGUST 4, 2021

District Judge Kathleen Cardone in El Paso has blocked an executive order by Texas Governor Greg Abbott that banned the transportation of migrants within the state by anyone other than law enforcement, reports the Wall Street Journal. immigration law. Meanwhile, Reuters reports that the U.S.

Immigration 52

Immigration Court Rules Laws Court 52

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 14, 2021

Inslee , a challenge to a Washington state law that shields the personal information of in-home care providers from public disclosure but allows the state to provide that data to the union that represents the providers. Garland is an immigration case. On Monday, the court denied review to just one of those cases, Boardman v.

Immigration 99

Immigration Punitive Damages Court Compensatory Damages 99

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 31, 2024

All concern the same basic issue of immigration law. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement can summarily reinstate the deportation order. Garland , 24-11 Issue : Whether federal courts of appeals have jurisdiction to review a denial by the Board of Immigration Appeals of withholding-only relief. Garland , Martinez v.

Immigration 108

Immigration Court Government Laws 108

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 10, 2024

Below is my column in USA Today on states and cities joining the “resistance” to the Trump Administration and its immigration policies. Immigration proved to be one of the top issues for voters in this year’s election, which brought control of both houses of Congress and the White House to the GOP.

Immigration 68

Immigration Government Felony Healthcare 68

JonathanTurley

APRIL 29, 2025

” While Dugan initially contested the allegations that she assisted an illegal immigrant to evade federal authorities in her Milwaukee courthouse, Democrats are heralding her as a type of Harriet Tubman guiding illegal immigrants to safety. The defense team for Judge Hannah Dugan is likely thinking, “This is not helpful.”

Immigration 79

Immigration Felony Criminal Law Court 79

JURIST

JANUARY 27, 2025

Navajo Nation officials have said that at least 15 Indigenous people in Arizona and New Mexico have reported being detained or questioned by federal law enforcement and asked to prove their citizenship since last Wednesday. He also designated Operation Rainbow Bridge to field calls on this issue for his office moving forward.

Immigration 245

Immigration Government Laws 245

JURIST

FEBRUARY 26, 2025

The US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down several provisions in two Arizona laws on Tuesday that required voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship (DPOC) to vote in elections. The defendants include Arizona state officials, Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, and Attorney General Kris Mayes, among others.

Court 129

Court Laws Immigration Government 129

The Crime Report

MAY 17, 2021

But most worrying, we found deep uncertainty about whether current law enforcement structures can meet the challenges of a deeply polarized society. a professor of law at Yale Law School, and author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning book, Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America. “We James Forman Jr.

Government 144

Government Laws Diligence Calendaring 144

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to set immigration policy. Texas and Louisiana are challenging a federal policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation, arguing that it violates federal law.

Immigration 101

Immigration Government Healthcare Court 101

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 19, 2024

Share The Supreme Court on Monday allowed Texas to enforce a controversial law that would allow state law enforcement officials to arrest individuals suspected of entered the United States illegally. A parallel lawsuit, filed by El Paso County and two immigrants’ rights groups, was consolidated with the government’s case.

Laws 143

Laws Immigration Court Litigating 143

JURIST

OCTOBER 2, 2023

Arizona ; Devillier v. The Netchoice cases surround constitutionality of state laws in Florida and Texas that regulate who social media platforms can and cannot ban and what kinds of social media posts can and cannot be banned. Arizona and Ayala Chapa v. All cases listed in Friday’s order were granted certiorari.

Court 232

Court Immigration Statute Government 232

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 7, 2022

Last term, the court dismissed as improvidently granted, or “DIG”ed , a case brought by Republican-controlled states challenging the government’s repeal of a Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule. Those states, led by Arizona, appealed to the Supreme Court. It takes four votes to grant a petition.

Immigration 75

Immigration Litigation Litigating Administrative Law 75