Arizona Immigration Litigating 
LegalReader
MARCH 19, 2021
Immigrants’ rights advocates are pushing back against Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s attempts to block President Joe Biden’s latest changes to U.S. immigration policy. On Tuesday, a coalition of immigration and Latino advocacy groups announced a lawsuit against Brnovich’s office.
LegalReader
DECEMBER 14, 2022
The lawsuit alleges that Arizona has not only usurped the federal government's jurisdiction over border policy but actively prevented civil servants from continuing routine work along the U.S.-Mexico Mexico border.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LawSites
DECEMBER 7, 2023
Clearbox builds solutions to simplify the US immigration process for DIY applicants. Courtroom5 , a platform that helps self-represented litigants navigate complex civil litigation matters, licensed their tech to NCCU Law for classroom use and is in development on a new platform slated for release in spring 2024.
Constitutional Law Reporter
MARCH 10, 2022
The issues before the Court involved Native American law and immigration. City and County of San Francisco, California : The case revolves around a legal challenge to a federal immigration rule. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. Supreme Court recently returned to the bench for its February sitting.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JANUARY 25, 2024
Individuals are sometimes removed from the No Fly List during ongoing litigation about their placement on that list. Garland: The immigration case centers on the Immigration and Nationality Act, which provides that a noncitizen who does not appear at a removal hearing shall be ordered removed in absentia. Campos-Chaves v.
The Crime Report
JANUARY 4, 2023
When agencies refused to turn over public records, ProPublica’s lawyers threatened litigation and in one case sued. A team of researchers from Arizona State University and John Jay College of Criminal Justice recently received a federal grant to study 1,000 911 calls. Let alone in high-stakes criminal justice situations.”.
SCOTUSBlog
NOVEMBER 17, 2023
8, the justices will hear oral argument in a dispute involving a doctrine known as the “voluntary cessation” doctrine – the principle that plaintiffs can continue to litigate their case unless the defendant shows that it cannot simply resume the conduct that prompted the lawsuit after the case is dismissed. Arizona (Jan. Singh , Jan.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
104 
Let's personalize your content